A MULTICENTER COMPARISON OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ISRADIPINE AND ENALAPRIL IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION

被引:15
作者
EISNER, GM
JOHNSON, BF
MCMAHON, FG
RUDD, P
SOWERS, JR
VARGAS, R
ZEMEL, M
机构
[1] Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester
[2] Hypertension Division, Tulane University School of Medi­cine, New Orleans, LA
[3] Division of General Internal Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA
[4] Endocrinology Research Center, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Detroit, MI
关键词
HYPERTENSION; ISRADIPINE; ENALAPRIL; CALCIUM ANTAGONIST; ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME (ACE) INHIBITOR;
D O I
10.1093/ajh/4.2.154S
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
This multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of isradipine and enalapril in 160 patients with essential hypertension. Patients received isradipine or enalapril for 10 weeks after a placebo wash-out period of three to five weeks. Dosage was titrated for six weeks on the basis of blood pressure (BP) response and was then maintained for the remainder of the study. Isradipine reduced systolic and diastolic BP by 12 and 9 mm Hg, respectively, and enalapril by 10 and 7 mm Hg, respectively (between-treatment difference P < .05 for diastolic BP). Overall, isradipine resulted in a higher responder rate, particularly among patients who had higher entry BPs. Fifteen enalapril-treated patients and four isradipine-treated patients discontinued treatment (four taking enalapril and none taking isradipine withdrew because of lack of efficacy). The most frequently reported adverse reactions were headache, dizziness, and edema in the isradipine group, and cough, headache, and chest pain in the enalapril group. Both drugs produced significant reductions in BP, but, in this study isradipine was more effective. The drugs were similarly well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:S154 / S157
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Kirkendall W.M., Comparative assessment of first-line agents for treatment of hypertension, Am J Med, 84, pp. 32-41, (1988)
[2]  
Shepherd A., Carr A.A., Davidov M., Et al., Efficacy and safety of isradipine, J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 13, pp. 580-585, (1989)
[3]  
Winer N., Thys-Jacobs S., Kumar R., Et al., Evaluation of isradipine (PN 200-110) in mild to moderate hypertension, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 42, pp. 442-448, (1987)
[4]  
Mohanty P.K., Gonasun L.M., Goodman R.P., Et al., Isradipine (PN 200-110) versus hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate hypertension: A multicenter study, Am J Hy-Pertens, 1, pp. 241S-244S, (1988)
[5]  
Swartz S.L., Antihypertensive and hormonal effects of PN 200-110, a new calcium-channel blocker, in essential hypertension, J Clin Hypertens, 3, pp. 463-469, (1987)
[6]  
Swartz S.L., Gonasun L.M., McAllister R.G., Thadani U., A multicenter comparison of isradipine and prazosin for treatment of essential hypertension, Clin Pharmacol Ther
[7]  
Rauramaa R., Taskinen E., Seppanen K., Et al., Effects of calcium antagonist treatment on blood pressure, lipoproteins, and prostaglandins, Am J Med, 84, pp. 93-96, (1988)
[8]  
Vermeulen A., Wester A., Willemse P., Et al., Comparison of isradipine and diltiazem in the treatment of essential hypertension, Am J Med, 84, pp. 42-45, (1988)
[9]  
Todd P.A., Heel R.C., Enalapril: A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure, Drugs, 31, pp. 198-248, (1986)
[10]  
Croog S.H., Levine S., Testa M.A., Et al., The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life, N Engl J Med, 314, 26, pp. 1657-1664, (1986)