Acute outcomes after coronary orbital atherectomy at a single center without on-site surgical backup: An experience in diabetics versus non-diabetics

被引:3
作者
Whitbeck, Matthew G. [1 ]
Dewar, James [1 ]
Behrens, Ann N. [2 ]
Watkins, Jeffrey [1 ]
Martinsen, Brad J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sanford Bemidji Heart & Vasc Ctr, 1300 Anne St NW, Bemidji, MN 56601 USA
[2] Cardiovasc Syst Inc, 1225 Old Highway 8 NW, St Paul, MN 55112 USA
关键词
Orbital atherectomy; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Surgical backup; Diabetes mellitus;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2018.05.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of severely calcified lesions is associated with a high risk of angiographic complication, incomplete stent expansion, and restenosis. The prevalence of calcification is increased in diabetics (DM) and the PCI outcome in this population is often suboptimal. Treatment with orbital atherectomy (OA) in severely calcified lesions has been shown to result in favorable procedural outcomes and low reintervention rates; in DM and non-DM. We sought to determine the acute safety of OA in a center without on-site surgical backup in DM and non-DM. Methods: All corners treated with OA at Sanford Bemidji Heart and Vascular Center (Bemidji, MN) from 8/30/16 to 4/14/17 were included in this retrospective analysis. Baseline, procedure, and acute outcome data were compared in DM and non-DM patients. Results: Of the 70 patients treated with OA, 40% were DM. History of hypertension and chronic renal disease were more prevalent in the DM group. Successful stent delivery occurred in 96.4% of DM and 100% in non-DM, respectively. None of the patients treated with OA died or experienced abrupt closure. severe dissection. embolization, or no reflow. The overall perforation and slow flow rates were 1.4%. One non-DM patient had a non-target vessel MI due to side branch closure. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the safety of OA in a center without on-site surgical backup. In this study, OA treatment resulted in a high rate of successful stent delivery and low rates of angiographic complications and acute MACE, in DM and non-DM patients. Summary: In this retrospective study we sought to determine the acute safety of coronary orbital atherectomy treatment in a center without on-site surgical backup in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. None of the patients treated with orbital atherectomy died or experienced abrupt closure, severe dissection, embolization, or no reflow; the overall perforation and slow flow rates were 1.4% and one non-diabetic patient had a non-target vessel myocardial infarction due to side branch closure. Our study demonstrates the safety of orbital atherectomy in a center without on-site surgical backup; orbital atherectomy treatment resulted in a high rate of successful stent delivery and low rates of angiographic complications and acute major adverse cardiac events in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S12 / S15
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Coronary heart disease in patients with diabetes - Part II: Recent advances in coronary revascularization
    Berry, Colin
    Tardif, Jean-Claude
    Bourassa, Martial G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (06) : 643 - 656
  • [2] Chambers Jeffrey W, 2016, Interv Cardiol Clin, V5, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.iccl.2015.12.003
  • [3] Pivotal Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Orbital Atherectomy System in Treating De Novo, Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions (ORBIT II)
    Chambers, Jeffrey W.
    Feldman, Robert L.
    Himmelstein, Stevan I.
    Bhatheja, Rohit
    Villa, Augusto E.
    Strickman, Neil E.
    Shlofmitz, Richard A.
    Dulas, Daniel D.
    Arab, Dinesh
    Khanna, Puneet K.
    Lee, Arthur C.
    Ghali, Magdi G. H.
    Shah, Rakesh R.
    Davis, Thomas P.
    Kim, Christopher Y.
    Tai, Zaheed
    Patel, Kirit C.
    Puma, Joseph A.
    Makam, Prakash
    Bertolet, Barry D.
    Nseir, Georges Y.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (05) : 510 - 518
  • [4] Coronary Stents in Diabetic Patients: State of the Knowledge
    Codner, Pablo
    Gurm, Hitinder Singh
    Motivala, Apurva
    [J]. CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 19 (04)
  • [5] Clinical end points in coronary stent trials - A case for standardized definitions
    Cutlip, Donald E.
    Windecker, Stephan
    Mehran, Roxana
    Boam, Ashley
    Cohen, David J.
    van Es, Gerrit-Anne
    Steg, P. Gabriel
    Morel, Marie-angele
    Mauri, Laura
    Vranckx, Pascal
    McFadden, Eugene
    Lansky, Alexandra
    Hamon, Martial
    Krucoff, Mitchell W.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (17) : 2344 - 2351
  • [6] SCAI/ACC/AHA Expert Consensus Document: 2014 Update on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-Site Surgical Backup
    Dehmer, Gregory J.
    Blankenship, James C.
    Cilingiroglu, Mehmet
    Dwyer, James G.
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    Gardner, Timothy J.
    Grines, Cindy L.
    Singh, Mandeep
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 84 (02) : 169 - 187
  • [7] INCREASED CORONARY PERFORATION IN THE NEW DEVICE ERA - INCIDENCE, CLASSIFICATION, MANAGEMENT, AND OUTCOME
    ELLIS, SG
    AJLUNI, S
    ARNOLD, AZ
    POPMA, JJ
    BITTL, JA
    EIGLER, NL
    COWLEY, MJ
    RAYMOND, RE
    SAFIAN, RD
    WHITLOW, PL
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1994, 90 (06) : 2725 - 2730
  • [8] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Centers With and Without On-Site Surgical Backup An Updated Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies
    Lee, Joo Myung
    Hwang, Doyeon
    Park, Jonghanne
    Kim, Kyung-Jin
    Ahn, Chul
    Koo, Bon-Kwon
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2015, 132 (05) : 388 - 401
  • [9] Lee M, 2017, CARDIOVASC REVASCULA, V18, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.01.011
  • [10] Lee MS, 2018, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V30, P121