Phase-error analysis of high-order finite difference time domain scheme and its influence on calculation results of impulse response in closed sound field

被引:46
作者
Sakamoto, Shinichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Inst Ind Sci, Meguro Ku, 4-6-1 Komaba, Tokyo 1538505, Japan
关键词
Finite difference time domain method; Impulse response; Phase error;
D O I
10.1250/ast.28.295
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
To obtain accurate impulse responses in a sound field by numerical analysis, a high-order finite difference time domain (FDTD) method was formulated on the basis of a simple Taylor expansion. The accuracy of the FDTD scheme was evaluated by Von Neumann and Richtmyer dispersion analysis. It was found that the unavoidable phase error obtained from the conventional FDTD algorithm is reduced using the high-order scheme with 8 or more reference points. When using higher orders in the scheme used in this study, the time resolution should be small to reduce the phase error. To validate the FDTD scheme for calculating the impulse response in a closed sound field, the numerical result was compared with an analytical solution obtained by the separation of variables method. It was found that the phase error for a low-order FDTD appeared as fluctuations of the arriving pulses and that the fluctuations can be reduced using the high-order scheme with a small time resolution. The accuracy of the FDTD calculation for a large-scale sound field or a long-time calculation, which we should consider when making a sound field analysis of room acoustics or outdoor noise propagation, is strongly influenced by the phase error and therefore the error should be considered when performing such numerical analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 309
页数:15
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   A new minimum storage Runge-Kutta scheme for computational acoustics [J].
Calvo, M ;
Franco, JM ;
Rández, L .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2004, 201 (01) :1-12
[2]  
Deveze T., 1992, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 1992 Digest. Held in Conjuction with: URSI Radio Science Meeting and Nuclear EMP Meeting (Cat. No.92CH3178-1), P346, DOI 10.1109/APS.1992.221928
[3]   A modified FDTD (2,4) scheme for modeling electrically large structures with high-phase accuracy [J].
Hadi, MF ;
PiketMay, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1997, 45 (02) :254-264
[4]   Low-dissipation and low-dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics [J].
Hu, FQ ;
Hussaini, MY ;
Manthey, JL .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1996, 124 (01) :177-191
[5]   COMPACT FINITE-DIFFERENCE SCHEMES WITH SPECTRAL-LIKE RESOLUTION [J].
LELE, SK .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1992, 103 (01) :16-42
[6]   Modeling of the seat dip effect using the finite-difference time-domaim method [J].
LoVetri, J ;
Mardare, D ;
Soulodre, G .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 100 (04) :2204-2212
[7]  
Manry C. W. Jr., 1995, Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal, V10, P17
[8]   PHASE ERROR CONTROL FOR FD TD METHODS OF 2ND AND 4TH-ORDER ACCURACY [J].
PETROPOULOS, PG .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1994, 42 (06) :859-862
[9]   RELATIVE ACCURACY OF SEVERAL FINITE-DIFFERENCE TIME-DOMAIN METHODS IN 2 AND 3 DIMENSIONS [J].
SHLAGER, KL ;
MALONEY, JG ;
RAY, SL ;
PETERSON, AF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1993, 41 (12) :1732-1737
[10]   DISPERSION-RELATION-PRESERVING FINITE-DIFFERENCE SCHEMES FOR COMPUTATIONAL ACOUSTICS [J].
TAM, CKW ;
WEBB, JC .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1993, 107 (02) :262-281