Is pooled data analysis of ventral and incisional hernia repair acceptable?

被引:42
|
作者
Koeckerling, Ferdinand [1 ]
Schug-Pass, Christine [1 ]
Adolf, Daniela [2 ]
Reinpold, Wolfgang [3 ]
Stechemesser, Bernd [4 ]
机构
[1] Vivantes Hosp Berlin, Acad Teaching Hosp, Ctr Minimally Invas Surg, Charite Med Sch,Dept Surg, Neue Bergstr 6, D-13585 Berlin, Germany
[2] StatConsult GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hamburg, Acad Teaching Hosp, Wilhelmsburger Hosp Gross Sand, Dept Surg, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Hernia Ctr Cologne, Cologne, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2015年 / 2卷
关键词
incisional hernia; umbilical hernia; epigastric hernia; ventral hernia; primary ventral hernia; complications; recurrence;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2015.00015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: In meta-analyses and systematic reviews comparing laparoscopic with open repair of ventral hernias, data on umbilical, epigastric, and incisional hernias are pooled. Based on data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry, we aimed to investigate whether the differences in the therapy and treatment results justified such an approach. Methods: Between 1st September 2009 and 31st August 2013, 31,664 patients with a ventral hernia were enrolled in the Herniamed Hernia Registry. The implicated hernias included 16,206 umbilical hernias, 3,757 epigastric hernias, and 11,701 incisional hernias. Data on the surgical techniques, postoperative complication rates, and 1-year follow-up results were subjected to statistical analysis to identify any significant differences between the various hernia types. Results: The laparoscopic IPOM technique was used significantly more often for incisional hernia than for epigastric hernia, 31.3 vs. 24.0%, respectively, and was used for 12.9% of umbilical hernias (p <0.0001). Likewise, the open technique with suturing of defect was used significantly more often for umbilical hernia than for epigastric hernia, 56.1 vs. 35.4%, respectively, and was used for 12.5% of incisional hernias (p < 0.0001). The postoperative complication rates of 3.2% for umbilical hernia and 3.5% for epigastric hernia were significantly lower than for incisional hernia, at 9.2% (p < 0.0001). That was also true for the reoperation rates due to postoperative complications, of 1.0 vs. 1.2 vs. 4.2% (p < 0.0001). The 1-year follow-up revealed significantly higher recurrence rates as well as rates of chronic pain needing treatment of 6.3 and 7.9%, respectively, for incisional hernia, compared with 4.1 and 4.3%, respectively, for epigastric hernia, and 2 and 1.9%, respectively, for umbilical hernia (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Since significant differences were identified in the therapy and treatment results between umbilical hernia, epigastric hernia, and incisional hernia, scientific studies should be conducted comparing the various surgical techniques only for a single hernia type.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair is Safer than Open Repair: Analysis of the NSQIP Data
    Hwang, Christine S.
    Wichterman, Keith A.
    Alfrey, Edward J.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 156 (02) : 213 - 216
  • [42] Planned Ventral Hernia After Open Abdomen Therapy: Complex Incisional Hernia Repair
    Klein, Angelina
    Willms, Arnulf
    Guesgen, Christoph
    Schwab, Robert
    Schaaf, Sebastian
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2024, 149 (06): : 516 - 521
  • [43] What Do We Know About the Chevrel Technique in Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair?
    Koeckerling, Ferdinand
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2019, 6
  • [44] Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex™ hernia patch
    Tollens, T.
    Den Hondt, M.
    Devroe, K.
    Terry, C.
    Speybroeck, S.
    Aelvoet, C.
    Vanrykel, J. -P.
    HERNIA, 2011, 15 (05) : 531 - 540
  • [45] Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex™ hernia patch
    T. Tollens
    M. Den Hondt
    K. Devroe
    C. Terry
    S. Speybroeck
    C. Aelvoet
    J.-P. Vanrykel
    Hernia, 2011, 15 : 531 - 540
  • [46] Should We Routinely Close the Fascial Defect in Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair?
    Sadava, Emmanuel E.
    Pena, Maria E.
    Schlottmann, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (06): : 856 - 859
  • [47] Removal of transabdominal sutures for chronic pain after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair
    Wassenaar, Eelco B.
    Raymakers, Johan T. F. J.
    Rakic, Srdjan
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2007, 17 (06): : 514 - 516
  • [48] The use of double-straight needle device in laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair
    Tagaya, N
    Mikami, H
    Nakano, S
    Shimoda, M
    Kogure, H
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2000, 10 (03): : 187 - 189
  • [49] EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair
    Muysoms, F.
    Campanelli, G.
    Champault, G. G.
    DeBeaux, A. C.
    Dietz, U. A.
    Jeekel, J.
    Klinge, U.
    Koeckerling, F.
    Mandala, V.
    Montgomery, A.
    Conde, S. Morales
    Puppe, F.
    Simmermacher, R. K. J.
    Smietanski, M.
    Miserez, M.
    HERNIA, 2012, 16 (03) : 239 - 250
  • [50] Cost-utility analysis of repair of reducible ventral hernia
    Stey, Anne M.
    Danzig, Matthew
    Qiu, Sylvia
    Yin, Sujing
    Divino, Celia M.
    SURGERY, 2014, 155 (06) : 1081 - 1089