Is pooled data analysis of ventral and incisional hernia repair acceptable?

被引:42
|
作者
Koeckerling, Ferdinand [1 ]
Schug-Pass, Christine [1 ]
Adolf, Daniela [2 ]
Reinpold, Wolfgang [3 ]
Stechemesser, Bernd [4 ]
机构
[1] Vivantes Hosp Berlin, Acad Teaching Hosp, Ctr Minimally Invas Surg, Charite Med Sch,Dept Surg, Neue Bergstr 6, D-13585 Berlin, Germany
[2] StatConsult GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hamburg, Acad Teaching Hosp, Wilhelmsburger Hosp Gross Sand, Dept Surg, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Hernia Ctr Cologne, Cologne, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2015年 / 2卷
关键词
incisional hernia; umbilical hernia; epigastric hernia; ventral hernia; primary ventral hernia; complications; recurrence;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2015.00015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: In meta-analyses and systematic reviews comparing laparoscopic with open repair of ventral hernias, data on umbilical, epigastric, and incisional hernias are pooled. Based on data from the Herniamed Hernia Registry, we aimed to investigate whether the differences in the therapy and treatment results justified such an approach. Methods: Between 1st September 2009 and 31st August 2013, 31,664 patients with a ventral hernia were enrolled in the Herniamed Hernia Registry. The implicated hernias included 16,206 umbilical hernias, 3,757 epigastric hernias, and 11,701 incisional hernias. Data on the surgical techniques, postoperative complication rates, and 1-year follow-up results were subjected to statistical analysis to identify any significant differences between the various hernia types. Results: The laparoscopic IPOM technique was used significantly more often for incisional hernia than for epigastric hernia, 31.3 vs. 24.0%, respectively, and was used for 12.9% of umbilical hernias (p <0.0001). Likewise, the open technique with suturing of defect was used significantly more often for umbilical hernia than for epigastric hernia, 56.1 vs. 35.4%, respectively, and was used for 12.5% of incisional hernias (p < 0.0001). The postoperative complication rates of 3.2% for umbilical hernia and 3.5% for epigastric hernia were significantly lower than for incisional hernia, at 9.2% (p < 0.0001). That was also true for the reoperation rates due to postoperative complications, of 1.0 vs. 1.2 vs. 4.2% (p < 0.0001). The 1-year follow-up revealed significantly higher recurrence rates as well as rates of chronic pain needing treatment of 6.3 and 7.9%, respectively, for incisional hernia, compared with 4.1 and 4.3%, respectively, for epigastric hernia, and 2 and 1.9%, respectively, for umbilical hernia (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Since significant differences were identified in the therapy and treatment results between umbilical hernia, epigastric hernia, and incisional hernia, scientific studies should be conducted comparing the various surgical techniques only for a single hernia type.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pooled data analysis of primary ventral (PVH) and incisional hernia (IH) repair is no more acceptable: results of a systematic review and metanalysis of current literature
    Stabilini, C.
    Cavallaro, G.
    Dolce, P.
    Capoccia Giovannini, S.
    Corcione, F.
    Frascio, M.
    Sodo, M.
    Merola, G.
    Bracale, U.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (05) : 831 - 845
  • [2] Pooled data analysis of primary ventral (PVH) and incisional hernia (IH) repair is no more acceptable: results of a systematic review and metanalysis of current literature
    C. Stabilini
    G. Cavallaro
    P. Dolce
    S. Capoccia Giovannini
    F. Corcione
    M. Frascio
    M. Sodo
    G. Merola
    U. Bracale
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 831 - 845
  • [3] Laparoscopic versus open repair of incisional/ventral hernia: a meta-analysis
    Sajid, Muhammad S.
    Bokhari, Syed A.
    Mallick, Ali S.
    Cheek, Elizabeth
    Baig, Mirza K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 197 (01): : 64 - 72
  • [4] Parietex™ Composite Ventral Patch for primary and incisional hernia repair
    Barranquero, Alberto G.
    Villalobos Mori, Rafael
    Maestre Gonzalez, Yolanda
    Pier Protti, Gian
    Lopez Soler, Guillermo
    Leon, Fernando Villarreal
    Alfaro, Irvin Jair Gonzalez
    Juan Olsina Kissler, Jorge
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (7-8) : 1799 - 1805
  • [5] Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair
    Franklin, ME
    Dorman, JP
    Glass, JL
    Balli, JE
    Gonzalez, JJ
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 8 (04) : 294 - 299
  • [6] Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernia
    Kua, KB
    Coleman, M
    Martin, I
    O'Rourke, N
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 72 (04) : 296 - 299
  • [7] Evolution and advances in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair
    Vorst, Alan L.
    Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos
    Carbonell, Alfredo M.
    Franz, Michael G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 7 (11): : 293 - 305
  • [8] Emergent laparoscopic repair of incarcerated incisional and ventral hernia
    O. Landau
    S. Kyzer
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2004, 18 : 1374 - 1376
  • [9] Emergent laparoscopic repair of incarcerated incisional and ventral hernia
    Landau, O
    Kyzer, S
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (09): : 1374 - 1376
  • [10] Should panniculectomy be applied with ventral hernia repair in a single session?
    Kirmizi, Serdar
    Huseyinoglu, Emil
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 46 (03): : 959 - 965