Value-at-Risk: evaluation of the behavior of different methodologies for 5 Latin American countries

被引:0
作者
Cesar Alonso, Julio [1 ]
Manuel Chaves, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Icesi, Ctr Invest Econ & Finanzas, Cali, Colombia
关键词
Value-at-Risk; Back-testing; Parametric Approach; Non-parametric Approach; Latin America;
D O I
10.1016/S0123-5923(13)70018-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the performance of 20 different methods (parametric, and semi-parametric, and non-parametric), as well as the historical simulation method, to estimate the next-trading-day value-at risk (VaR) of a representative portfolio for 5 different Latin American countries (Argentina, Brasil, Colombia and Peru). We found that the non-parametric (i.e. historic simulation), and the semi-parametric methods were the best way to estimate the risk among the twenty different methods evaluated for all the countries in the sample. (C) 2013 Universidad ICESI. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Alonso J. C., 2010, COLECCION DISCERNIR
[2]  
Alonso J. C., 2005, CUATRO HECHOS ESTILI
[3]  
Barone-Adesi G, 1999, J FUTURES MARKETS, V19, P583, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9934(199908)19:5<583::AID-FUT5>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-S
[5]  
Barone-Adesi G., 2001, ECON NOTES, V30, P167, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.0391-5026.2001.00052.X
[6]   GENERALIZED AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY [J].
BOLLERSLEV, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1986, 31 (03) :307-327
[7]   Evaluating interval forecasts [J].
Christoffersen, PF .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :841-862
[8]  
Cont R, 2001, QUANT FINANC, V1, P223, DOI 10.1088/1469-7688/1/2/304
[9]  
Cross F., 1973, FINANCIAL ANAL J, V29, P67, DOI [10.2469/faj.v29.n6.67, DOI 10.2469/FAJ.V29.N6.67]
[10]  
Ding Z., 1993, J EMPIR FINANC, V1, P83, DOI DOI 10.1016/0927-5398(93)90006-D