Proactive and Reactive Attitude to Crisis: Evidence from European Firms

被引:18
作者
Brzozowski, Jan [1 ]
Cucculelli, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Fac Econ Giorgio Fua, Dept Econ & Social Sci DISES, Piazzale R Martelli 8, I-60121 Ancona, Italy
关键词
proactive behaviour; crisis reaction; investment; product introduction;
D O I
10.15678/EBER.2016.040111
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the behaviour of European firms in the time of the economic crisis in 2008-2009. We analyse the determinants of proactive strategies in the context of innovation and the range of products offered by every firm on the market. Research Design & Methods: Based on a large and representative sample of 14 750 (EFIGE dataset) firms from Austria, Germany, France, Hungary, Italy, Spain and the UK, we estimate the logit model for two measures of proactive strategy: the investment behaviour and the introduction of new products on the market. Findings: We find evidence that the experience of the former crisis by the company is associated with the adoption of proactive behaviour in the case of investments in innovation, and reactive behaviour in the case of the product offer range. Implications & Recommendations: As the public support for innovative investments proved to be rather ineffective, the most promising direction for public policies in the times of crisis are those that facilitate the access to external financing. Contribution & Value Added: Our paper contributes to the development of knowledge on the dynamics of company behaviour in the wake of the economic crisis in 2008, and to the better understanding of the determinants of proactive behaviour of enterprises within the context of rising uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 191
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Employee incentives and energy firms' innovation: Evidence from China
    Si, Deng-Kui
    Wang, Yanan
    Kong, Dongmin
    ENERGY, 2020, 212
  • [32] Trade liberalization and heterogeneous firms' adjustments: evidence from India
    Bas, Maria
    Ledezma, Ivan
    REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2020, 156 (02) : 407 - 441
  • [33] Ownership structure and divestiture decisions: Evidence from Australian firms
    Pascal Nguyen
    Rahman, Nahid
    Zhao, Ruoyun
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 30 : 170 - 181
  • [34] Decentralization of firms in a country with weak institutions: Evidence from Russia
    Levina, Irina
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2020, 48 (04) : 933 - 950
  • [35] Digital transformation and firms' bargaining power: Evidence from China
    Zhu, Yongyi
    Yu, Di
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024, 183
  • [36] Government Control and Privatized Firms' Performance: Evidence from Vietnam
    Manh Hoang Nguyen
    Quy Thi Vo
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2020, 7 (10): : 663 - 673
  • [37] Restrictive bond covenants: Evidence from family firms in China
    Zhang, Xueying
    Feng, Chao
    Walker, Thomas
    Barabanov, Sergey
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2025, 89
  • [38] Economic uncertainty and corruption: Evidence from public and private firms
    Afzali, Mansoor
    Colak, Gonul
    Fu, Mengchuan
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STABILITY, 2021, 57
  • [39] Firms' Evaluation of Location Quality: Evidence from East Germany
    Eickelpasch, Alexander
    Hirte, Georg
    Stephan, Andreas
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2016, 236 (02): : 241 - 273
  • [40] Extreme heat and firms' robot adoption: Evidence from China
    Tang, Yuwei
    He, Zhenyu
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 85