The Effects of Online Collaborative Writing and TOEIC Writing Test-Preparation on L2 Writing Performance

被引:15
作者
Bailey, Daniel R. [1 ]
Judd, Christopher [2 ]
机构
[1] Konkuk Univ, Dept English Language & Literature, Glocal Campus, Chungju Si, South Korea
[2] Korea Polytech Univ, Dept English, Shihung, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL | 2018年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
online collaborative learning; computer aided language learning; Facebook; TOEIC writing; L2; writing;
D O I
10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.8.383
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper compares the effects of Online Collaborative Writing (OCW) and the Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC) writing training on second language (L2) writing performance with respect to lexical variation, syntactic complexity, and writing accuracy between two groups of South Korean university students. Treatments consisted of OCW through posting in private Facebook groups, while students in the TOEIC group practiced answering TOEIC writing questions. In addition to tracking changes in L2 writing performance, this study investigated the efficacy of OCW towards TOEIC writing goals outside the context of explicit TOEIC writing training in order to provide additional modes of preparation for the TOEIC test. This quasi-experimental study, conducted over an eight-week period, collected writing samples from a pre-and post-writing task consisting of items that are conceptually similar to both OCW and TOEIC writing questions. Results revealed students in the OCW group increased in L2 writing accuracy at a statistically significant level indicating social media platforms like Facebook can assist students in meeting the accuracy criteria of the TOEIC writing test. Both groups wrote fewer adjectives in task 2, but the decrease was only statistically significant for the TOEIC group. Pedagogical implications and future research directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 397
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   DOES WASHBACK EXIST [J].
ALDERSON, JC ;
WALL, D .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 1993, 14 (02) :115-129
[2]  
Alm-Lequeux A., 2006, JALT CALL J, V2, P29, DOI [10.29140/jaltcall.v2n3.30, DOI 10.29140/JALTCALL.V2N3.30]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J 2 LANGUAGE TEACHIN
[4]  
Arslan R.S., 2014, TOJET, V13, P131
[5]  
Bailey D. R., 2016, SOC TEACHING ENGLISH, V17, P83
[6]  
BAILEY DR, 2017, CALL EJ, V18, P14
[7]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A, DOI DOI 10.4135/
[8]   Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2008, 17 (02) :102-118
[9]  
Booth D. K., 2012, THESIS
[10]   The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J].
Chandler, J .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2003, 12 (03) :267-296