RENAL CALCULI IN LOWER POLE CALICES - WHAT IS THE BEST METHOD OF TREATMENT

被引:65
作者
NETTO, NR
CLARO, JFA
LEMOS, GC
CORTADO, PL
机构
[1] Division of Urology, Hospital Israelita A. Einstein, Sao Paulo
关键词
KIDNEY CALCULI; KIDNEY PELVIS; LITHOTRIPSY; EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37905-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*) can be used in the treatment of lower pole caliceal calculi. In a retrospective analysis these 2 therapies were compared for treatment of solitary lower pole caliceal calculi to evaluate morbidity. During a 2-year period 23 patients treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 24 who underwent ESWL with the Siemens Lithostar were analyzed in regard to the success rate, effectiveness quotient, complication rate, length of hospitalization and disability period. Followup consisted of ultrasound and/or a plain film of the kidneys, ureters and bladder 1 day and 1 to 3 months postoperatively. A nephrotomogram was included in the ESWL group. Complete removal of all stone fragments was achieved in 93.6% of the patients treated percutaneously without retreatment. In the ESWL group the success rate was 79.2% with a 41.6% retreatment rate. On the other hand, the ESWL group had a shorter hospitalization and an earlier return to normal physical activities. Among the patients who underwent a percutaneous operation 13% had complications compared to 4.1% in the ESWL group. The recurrence rate was higher in the former group (13% within a median of 18 months, compared to 8.3% within a median of 11 months in the ESWL group). The mean stone diameter was 1.42 cm. in the percutaneous group and 1.22 cm. in the ESWL group. Stone composition was similar in both groups. Since ESWL is an effective noninvasive procedure without the need for routine anesthesia and hospitalization, and with prompt return of the patient to a normal life it must be considered the method of choice for lower caliceal stones less than 2 cm. in diameter. However, percutaneous nephrolithotomy will continue to have a primary role in the management of larger stones.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 723
页数:3
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   CASE FOR A MORE AGGRESSIVE APPROACH TO STAGHORN STONES [J].
BLANDY, JP ;
SINGH, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1976, 115 (05) :505-506
[2]   CURRENT STATE AND FUTURE-DEVELOPMENTS OF NONINVASIVE TREATMENT OF HUMAN URINARY STONES WITH EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
CHAUSSY, CG ;
FUCHS, GJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (03) :782-789
[3]   EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AS MONOTHERAPY OF STAGHORN RENAL CALCULI - 3 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE [J].
CONSTANTINIDES, C ;
RECKER, F ;
JAEGER, P ;
HAURI, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (06) :1415-1418
[4]   REPORT OF THE UNITED-STATES COOPERATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
DRACH, GW ;
DRETLER, S ;
FAIR, W ;
FINLAYSON, B ;
GILLENWATER, J ;
GRIFFITH, D ;
LINGEMAN, J ;
NEWMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (06) :1127-1133
[5]   FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUCCESS RATE OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTRIPSY AND THE INCIDENCE OF RETAINED FRAGMENTS [J].
GOLDWASSER, B ;
WEINERTH, JL ;
CARSON, CC ;
DUNNICK, NR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 136 (02) :358-360
[6]   LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP IN 1,003 EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY PATIENTS [J].
GRAFF, J ;
DIEDERICHS, W ;
SCHULZE, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 140 (03) :479-483
[7]  
HOLMLUND D, 1983, SCAND J UROL NEP S75, V17, P25
[8]   COMPARISON OF RESULTS AND MORBIDITY OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
LINGEMAN, JE ;
COURY, TA ;
NEWMAN, DM ;
KAHNOSKI, RJ ;
MERTZ, JHO ;
MOSBAUGH, PG ;
STEELE, RE ;
WOODS, JR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 138 (03) :485-490
[9]  
MCDOUGALL E M, 1989, Journal of Endourology, V3, P265, DOI 10.1089/end.1989.3.265
[10]  
NETTO NR, 1988, EUR UROL, V15, P9