THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN STATUTORY PENALTIES AND DOMESTIC ELDER ABUSE INVESTIGATIONS

被引:2
作者
Jogerst, Gerald [1 ]
Daly, Jeanette [1 ]
Brinig, Margaret [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bibas, Stephanos [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Family Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Law, Dept Law, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Amer Law Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Amer Assoc Law Sch, Chair Elect Family Law Sect, Washington, DC 20009 USA
[5] Univ Iowa, Coll Law, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[6] US Attorneys Off, Criminal Div, New York, NY 10007 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0735648X.2005.9721638
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Adult Protective Services statutes designate penalties for those who inflict abuse on elders. These penalties are either civil or criminal, with criminal penalties delineated as misdemeanors or felonies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship of criminal penalties for the infliction of abuse on the rates of reported, investigated, and substantiated domestic elder abuse for all states. The District of Columbia and forty-three states' APS-related statutes make elder abuse crimes felonies while thirty provide misdemeanors for some or all aspects of elder abuse. After taking into account demographic factors that influence investigation rates, states were found to have higher investigation rates if their statute made abuse a felony, had longer prison terms, tracked reports of abuse allegations, required reporting by professionals, and had more words in the definitions of abuse. After taking into account demographic factors that influence substantiation rates, states were found to have higher rates if the statute made abuse a felony, tracked reports of abuse allegations, and had more words in the definitions of abuse. States recognizing the seriousness of elder abuse by listing harsher penalties may convey this commitment to investigators, who are therefore more likely to investigate and substantiate abuse allegations.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 69
页数:19
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BERES LS, 2001, CONN L REV, V34, P55
[2]   Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial [J].
Bibas, S .
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 2004, 117 (08) :2463-2547
[3]   EXPLAINING FEAR OF CRIME [J].
BOX, S ;
HALE, C ;
ANDREWS, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 1988, 28 (03) :340-356
[4]   The public choice of elder abuse law [J].
Brinig, MF ;
Jogerst, G ;
Daly, J ;
Schmuch, G ;
Dawson, J .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2004, 33 (02) :517-549
[5]  
Bureau U. S. C., 2001, US CENS 2000 DEM PRO
[6]   Mandatory reporting: Relationship of APS statute language on state reported elder abuse [J].
Daly, JA ;
Jogerst, GJ ;
Brinig, MF .
JOURNAL OF ELDER ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2003, 15 (02) :1-21
[7]   APS workers job requirements associated with elder abuse rates [J].
Daly, JM ;
Jogerst, GJ ;
Haigh, KM ;
Leeney, JL ;
Dawson, JD .
SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 40 (03) :89-102
[8]   Statute definitions of elder abuse [J].
Daly, JM ;
Jogerst, G .
JOURNAL OF ELDER ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2001, 13 (04) :39-57
[9]   Police discretion and elder mistreatment: A nested model of observation, reporting, and satisfaction [J].
Daniels, RS ;
Baumhover, LA ;
Formby, WA ;
Clark-Daniels, CL .
JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 1999, 27 (03) :209-225
[10]  
Dolan R., 1989, J ELDER ABUSE NEGL, VI, P75