MARKET CONCENTRATION IN UNITED-STATES AND GREAT-BRITAIN

[1] Bain JS, 1966, INT DIFFERENCES INDU

[2] EVELY R, 1960, CONCENTRATION BRIT I, P50

[3] FLORENCE S, 1953, LOGIC BRIT AM INDUST, P130

[4] KAYSEN C, 1959, ANTITRUST POLICY, P300

[5] PASHIGIAN BP, 1968, J IND ECON JUL

[6] PASHIGIAN P, 6710 U CHIC CTR MATH

[7] Rosenbluth G, 1955, MEASURES CONCENTRATI, P57

[8] ESTIMATION OF OPTIMUM SIZE OF PLANT BY THE SURVIVOR TECHNIQUE [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1961, 75 (04) : 569 - 607

[9] A COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL CONCENTRATION IN THE UNITED-STATES AND BRITAIN [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1961, 43 (01) : 70 - 75

[10] ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF ANTITRUST LAWS [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1966, 9 (OCT) : 225 - 258

[1] Bain JS, 1966, INT DIFFERENCES INDU

[2] EVELY R, 1960, CONCENTRATION BRIT I, P50

[3] FLORENCE S, 1953, LOGIC BRIT AM INDUST, P130

[4] KAYSEN C, 1959, ANTITRUST POLICY, P300

[5] PASHIGIAN BP, 1968, J IND ECON JUL

[6] PASHIGIAN P, 6710 U CHIC CTR MATH

[7] Rosenbluth G, 1955, MEASURES CONCENTRATI, P57

[8] ESTIMATION OF OPTIMUM SIZE OF PLANT BY THE SURVIVOR TECHNIQUE [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1961, 75 (04) : 569 - 607

[9] A COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL CONCENTRATION IN THE UNITED-STATES AND BRITAIN [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1961, 43 (01) : 70 - 75

[10] ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF ANTITRUST LAWS [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1966, 9 (OCT) : 225 - 258