共 29 条
- [1] WINFRIED P. RUGGIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL, a division of JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No.: 1: 09-cv-1067 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47373 GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2010, 14 (05): : 387 - 391
- [2] FORT SILL APACHE TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. United States District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Action No. 14-958 (RMC) May 25, 2018 GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2018, 22 (07): : 429 - 437
- [3] STEPHEN WYNN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JAMES CHANOS, Defendant. Case No. 14-cv-04329-WHO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174396 GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 19 (03): : 216 - 222
- [4] SUN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT GAMING ENTERPRISE, et al., Defendants CIVIL ACTION NO. 3: 14-CV-01098 (JCH) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101384 August 3, 2015, Decided August 3, 2015, Filed GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 19 (08): : 614 - 620
- [5] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. WEI SENG PHUA, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2: 14-cr-00249-APG-PAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4688 January 8, 2015, Decided January 8, 2015, Filed GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 19 (02): : 179 - 180
- [6] STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO, et al., Defendants. EP-99-CV-320-KC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, EL PASO DIVISION 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28026 March 6, 2015, Decided March 6, 2015, Filed GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 19 (06): : 457 - 484
- [7] Mia Mason v. Machine Zone, Inc.Civil No. JKB-15-1107; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142790 (United States District Court for the District of Maryland, October 21, 2015) GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2016, 20 (02): : 211 - 218
- [8] CITIZENS FOR A BETTER WAY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Defendants No. 2: 12-cv-3021-TLN-AC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2015 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 128745 September 23, 2015, Decided September 24, 2015, Filed GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2016, 20 (01): : 118 - 132
- [9] AMERANTH, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENESIS GAMING SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., Defendants. CASE NO. SACV 11-00189 AG (RNBx),(Consolidated with SACV 13-00720 AG (RNBx)) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175600 November 12, 2014, Decided November 12, 2014, Filed GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 19 (02): : 166 - 171
- [10] Shuffle Tech International, LLC et al. v. Scientific Games Corporation et al.Case No. 15 C 3702; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138741 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, October 12, 2015) GAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2016, 20 (02): : 199 - 210