MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING-HISTOLOGIC CORRELATION OF SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS AND ADENOMATOUS HYPERPLASIAS

被引:13
|
作者
INOUE, E
KURODA, C
NARUMI, Y
FUJITA, M
KADOTA, T
KURIYAMA, K
YOSHIOKA, H
ISHIGURO, S
SASAKI, Y
IMAOKA, S
机构
[1] CTR ADULT DIS,DEPT PATHOL,OSAKA 537,JAPAN
[2] CTR ADULT DIS,DEPT SURG,OSAKA 537,JAPAN
关键词
LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199308000-00007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) usually consist of components of different histologic grade. Using surgically resected specimens, the authors obtained high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) images and studied the relationship between histologic grade of HCCs and MR signal intensity. METHOD. In vitro MRI was performed on 15 small (less than 20-mm diameter) HCCs and 2 patients with adenomatous hyperplasia (AH) within 1 hour of surgical resection. In these 17 lesions, 24 macroscopic nodular components corresponding to MR images were recognized pathologically. The difference in MR signal intensity was examined by using tumor/phantom (T/P) signal-intensity ratio. In addition, the correlations between signal intensity on MRI and histologic criteria for grading HCC were studied. RESULTS. On T2-weighted images, grade II HCCs had significantly greater T/P values than grade I HCCs (P < .01). There is the correlation (r = .88, P < .001) between nucleocytoplasmic (N/C) ratio and signal intensity of small HCCs and AHs on T2-weighted images. CONCLUSION. The N/C ratio is an important factor relating the signal intensity to the histologic grade of these lesions on T2-weighted images.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 697
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INDICATIONS FOR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    SCHORNER, W
    FELIX, R
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1989, 114 (33) : 1248 - 1252
  • [32] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE KNEE
    MINK, JH
    DEUTSCH, AL
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1989, (244) : 29 - 47
  • [33] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING OF THE ADRENAL
    BYDDER, GM
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1988, 39 (05) : 568 - 568
  • [34] NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    POPE, JM
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1982, 35 (06): : 761 - 768
  • [35] NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    KARSTAEDT, N
    DIXON, RL
    WOLFMAN, NT
    EKSTRAND, KE
    SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1983, 19 (03): : 206 - 214
  • [36] IMAGING OF THE BREAST WITH MAGNETIC-RESONANCE
    ENNIS, J
    CAZANAVE, C
    HAMLIN, D
    MARECI, T
    SCOTT, K
    BLAND, K
    FREDERICKS, E
    COPELAND, E
    WILLIAMS, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1984, 9 (07): : A32 - A32
  • [37] NERVES ON MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    COLLINS, JD
    SHAVER, ML
    BATRA, P
    BROWN, K
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 81 (02) : 129 - 134
  • [38] PRINCIPLES OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    HARMS, SE
    RINCK, PA
    MUNCHENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1984, 126 (29-3): : 898 - 902
  • [39] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING IN NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGY
    WONG, EK
    GARDNER, BP
    JOURNAL OF MIND AND BEHAVIOR, 1988, 9 (03): : 273 - 287
  • [40] NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING
    THOMAS, SR
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1982, 9 (04) : 647 - 647