Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Caesarean Section: A Case-Control Study of Post discharge Surveillance

被引:14
作者
Griffiths, Jill [1 ]
Demianczuk, Nestor [2 ]
Cordoviz, Melody [3 ]
Joffe, A. Mark [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Royal Alexandra Hosp, Infect Prevent Serv, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Div Infect Dis, Dept Internal Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Caesarean section; elective; antibiotic prophylaxis; surgical site infection;
D O I
10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30460-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To ascertain the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) following elective Caesarean section (CS) and to compare demographie characteristics and antibiotic administration between infected cases and noninfected control subjects. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing elective CS between 1996 and 2002 at a tertiary centre. Infection-control personnel attempted to contact by telephone all women who had had Caesarean sections, 1 month after their surgery. The women they reached were asked to complete a questionnaire based on CDC-validated criteria for infection to determine whether S81 had occurred. Control subjects without SSI were matched on the basis of having had an elective CS and by date of surgery. We then reviewed the hospital records of both groups. Results: Over the study period, 1250 elective Caesarean sections were performed and 124 infected cases were identified, giving an overall SSI incidence of 9.9%. Of the 342 women reviewed (124 cases, 218 control subjects), 23% received prophylactic intraoperative antibiotics. Cases and control subjects differed significantly in terms of estimated blood loss, with fewer control subjects having excessive blood loss (P = 0.04). Among those women receiving postoperative antibiotics, case subjects received a significantly higher number of doses than did control subjects (P = 0.003). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of overall antibiotic administration or other demographic variables. Conclusions: The incidence of SSI following elective CS according to postdischarge surveillance was 9.9%, which is higher than expected for a low-risk procedure. Because follow-up was not possible for all cases, this incidence may be an underestimate. Underuse of antimicrobial prophylaxis mayaiso be a contributing factor, because prophylactic antibiotics were administered in less than 25% of cases.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 344
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2003, OBSTET GYNECOL, V102
[2]   THE EFFECT OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS ON RISK-FACTORS FOR ENDOMYOMETRITIS IN ADOLESCENT PATIENTS UNDERGOING CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
APUZZIO, JJ ;
GANESH, VV ;
PELOSI, MA ;
FRISOLI, G .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1984, 5 (03) :163-166
[3]   Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project [J].
Bratzler, DW ;
Houck, PM .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (12) :1706-1715
[4]   Prophylactic use of antibiotics for nonlaboring patients undergoing cesarean delivery with intact membranes: A meta-analysis [J].
Chelmow, D ;
Ruehli, MS ;
Huang, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (04) :656-661
[5]  
DUFF P, 1982, J REPROD MED, V27, P133
[6]  
JAKOBI P, 1994, J REPROD MED, V39, P707
[7]  
Joffe AM, 2000, 4 DEC INT C NOS HEAL
[8]   A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ON THE USE OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
MAHOMED, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1988, 95 (07) :689-692
[9]   Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 [J].
Mangram, AJ ;
Horan, TC ;
Pearson, ML ;
Silver, LC ;
Jarvis, WR .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (04) :250-278
[10]   Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cesarean delivery [J].
Rizk, DEE ;
Nsanze, H ;
Mabrouk, MH ;
Mustafa, N ;
Thomas, L ;
Kumar, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1998, 61 (03) :245-251