The pilot judgements as a paradigmatic example of transformation of the European Court of Human Rights

被引:0
作者
Queralt Jimenez, Argelia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Derecho Constituc, Barcelona, Spain
来源
TEORIA Y REALIDAD CONSTITUCIONAL | 2018年 / 42卷
关键词
European system of protection; European Court of Human Rights; Constitutional Court; pilot judgment; Europe; Human Rights; dialogue among judges; effective remedy; subsidiarity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Fifty years after the ECtHR delivered its first judgement, the time has come to rethink the defining function of this jurisdiction. That means recognizing and analyzing in detail the tension between its role as a protector of individual rights and its role as a standard-setting body through which the process of European harmonisation in the field of fundamental rights takes place. This rethinking actually means considering which of the two functions, the protective or the harmonising one, should prevail in determining the position of the Court of Strasbourg in the European judicial area. One of the clearest elements of this transformation of the Court is the pilot judgment procedure, which tests the potential of the European Court as the European Constitutional Court.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 424
页数:30
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] ABRISKETA URIARTE Joana, 2013, REV ESPAOLA DERECHO, V65, P1
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, HIGH LEV C IMPL EUR
  • [3] BESSON S., 2011, HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECT, P112
  • [4] BUSTOS GISPERT R., 2012, REV ESP DERECHO CONS, P13
  • [5] Claramente, GERMAN LAW J, V12, P1233
  • [6] De Londras F, 2013, EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHT, V38
  • [7] Di MARCO A., REV TRIMESTRIELLE DR, P888
  • [8] FERRER-MACGREGOR E., 2017, HACIA GLOBALIZACION
  • [9] GARLICKI L., 2007, LIBER AMICORUM LUZIU, P183
  • [10] GARLICKI L., 2011, MELANGES HONNEUR JP, p[272, 273]