Improving English L2 Writing in Web Communication: Can Peer Feedback Help?

被引:0
作者
Flanagan, Marian [1 ]
Heine, Carmen [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept English, Sch Commun & Culture English Business Commun, Bldg 1481,Jens Chr Skous Vej 4, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
来源
FACHSPRACHE-JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL AND SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION | 2018年 / 40卷 / 3-4期
关键词
peer feedback; L2; writing; scaffolding; feedback types; revision types; phrasing of feedback; professional skills;
D O I
10.24989/fs.v50i3-4.1712
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
As teachers of English as a second language (L2) in web communication, our aim is to help(L2)students improve their spoken and written English language skills. Teacher feedback has been shown to do this in some cases. However, only using teacher feedback can put huge pressure on the teacher, both in terms of time and resources. This paper describes and discusses our attempt at introducing peer feedback as an additional way of providing students with feedback on their English writing. Before conducting this study, we did not know if peer feedback would be feasible in our teaching environment or whether it would benefit the students and teachers. Our aim was to establish a status quo of our students' abilities in providing and implementing peer feedback. We introduced peer-feedback tasks and focused on the types of feedback provided by the students, the phrasing of the feedback, both when implemented and not implemented by the students, and the types of revisions made by the students. Our findings allowed us to develop peer-feedback process guidelines for web communication as a way towards improving written feedback processes in higher education, and hopefully for others to adapt and implement in their own communication classrooms.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 121
页数:28
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] Exploring social constructivism: theories and practicalities
    Adams, Paul
    [J]. EDUCATION 3-13, 2006, 34 (03) : 243 - 257
  • [2] Altstaedter Laura Levi, 2016, INNOVATION LANGUAGE, V12, P137
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, PANNING GOLD INFORM
  • [4] Artemeva N., 2002, LANGUAGE LEARNING DI, V6, P62
  • [5] Askew S., 2000, FEEDBACK LEARNING
  • [6] Berg E. C., 1999, J SECOND LANG WRIT, V8, P215, DOI [10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5, DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5]
  • [7] Black P., 2003, ASSESSMENT LEARNING
  • [8] Boud D., 1995, ENHANCING LEARNING S
  • [9] Boud D. e, 2001, PEER LEARNING HIGHER
  • [10] Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design
    Boud, David
    Molloy, Elizabeth
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (06) : 698 - 712