Video Enhanced Multiple Choice Questions - Personalising eLearning

被引:0
|
作者
Adams, N. [1 ]
Porter, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ Mackay, Boundary Rd, Ooralea, Qld 4740, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Math & Appl Stat, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
来源
PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES | 2016年 / 24卷
关键词
Mathematics education; assessment; feedback; Multiple Choice Questions; assessment technology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Instructional videos have been successfully used to teach mathematical concepts to distance students. These videos allow the students to see and hear their lecturer with an added advantage of being able to stop and rewind or replay until the concept is understood. While videos facilitate student understanding, formative assessment provides both lecturer and student with an indication of the latter's mastery of a mathematical concept. Formative assessment with handwritten feedback is viewed as preferential because changing university culture means few academics have the time to provide comprehensive handwritten feedback to large numbers of students for every concept. Further, for this feedback to be useful it needs to be delivered to the student in a timely manner. The ability to provide instant feedback is one of the major advantages of online quizzes using multiple choice questions (MCQs). There are mixed attitudes towards MCQs within academia. For each attribute of MCQs, research can be found to both support and condemn it. Feedback from MCQs is undoubtedly fast but is it effective? Using video enhanced feedback for online quizzes may provide the best of both worlds.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 54
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using multiple-choice questions to evaluate in-depth learning of economics
    Buckles, S
    Siegfried, JJ
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2006, 37 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [22] Using multiple response true-false multiple choice questions
    Bandaranayake, R
    Payne, J
    White, S
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 69 (04): : 311 - 315
  • [23] Generating Adequate Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions
    Zhang, Cheng
    Sun, Yicheng
    Chen, Hejia
    Wang, Jie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (KDIR), VOL 1, 2020, : 310 - 315
  • [24] Multiple choice questions: answering correctly and knowing the answer
    McKenna, Peter
    INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND SMART EDUCATION, 2019, 16 (01) : 59 - 73
  • [25] Effect of faculty training on quality of Multiple Choice Questions
    Rauf, Ayesha Rauf
    Sultana, Shafaq
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 46 (02): : 430 - 433
  • [26] Psychometric Analysis for Chemical Kinetics Multiple Choice Questions
    D'Ottone, Luca
    Ochonogor, Enunuwe Chuckunoye
    ORBITAL-THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2019, 11 (01): : 53 - 63
  • [27] Fuzzy Evaluation of Examinees Through Multiple Choice Questions
    Fahmi, Ali
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    INFORMATICA, 2017, 28 (04) : 609 - 628
  • [28] A novel approach to generate distractors for Multiple Choice Questions
    Kumar, Archana Praveen
    Nayak, Ashalatha
    Shenoy, K. Manjula
    Goyal, Shashank
    Chaitanya
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 225
  • [29] Comparative Assessment In Pharmacology Multiple Choice Questions Versus Essay With Focus On Gender Differences
    Pai, M. R. S. M.
    Sanji, N.
    Pai, P. G.
    Kotian, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2010, 4 (03) : 2515 - 2520
  • [30] Effect of faculty training on quality of multiple-choice questions
    Gupta, Piyush
    Meena, Pinky
    Khan, Amir Maroof
    Malhotra, Rajeev Kumar
    Singh, Tejinder
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED AND BASIC MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (03) : 210 - 214