Video Enhanced Multiple Choice Questions - Personalising eLearning

被引:0
|
作者
Adams, N. [1 ]
Porter, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ Mackay, Boundary Rd, Ooralea, Qld 4740, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Math & Appl Stat, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
来源
PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES | 2016年 / 24卷
关键词
Mathematics education; assessment; feedback; Multiple Choice Questions; assessment technology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Instructional videos have been successfully used to teach mathematical concepts to distance students. These videos allow the students to see and hear their lecturer with an added advantage of being able to stop and rewind or replay until the concept is understood. While videos facilitate student understanding, formative assessment provides both lecturer and student with an indication of the latter's mastery of a mathematical concept. Formative assessment with handwritten feedback is viewed as preferential because changing university culture means few academics have the time to provide comprehensive handwritten feedback to large numbers of students for every concept. Further, for this feedback to be useful it needs to be delivered to the student in a timely manner. The ability to provide instant feedback is one of the major advantages of online quizzes using multiple choice questions (MCQs). There are mixed attitudes towards MCQs within academia. For each attribute of MCQs, research can be found to both support and condemn it. Feedback from MCQs is undoubtedly fast but is it effective? Using video enhanced feedback for online quizzes may provide the best of both worlds.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 54
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiple Choice Questions with Justifications
    Hegde, Anusha
    Ghosh, Nayanika
    Kumar, Viraj
    2014 IEEE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION (T4E), 2014, : 176 - 177
  • [2] Quality assessment of multiple-choice questions
    Akram, Zareena
    Aman, Khaliq
    Waheed, Nomira
    Rahim, Shiekh Kashif
    Hanif, Fouzia
    Abdullah, Zainab
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2025, 50 (01): : 191 - 194
  • [3] Multiple choice questions and essay questions in curriculum
    Kaipa, Roha Mariam
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 13 (01) : 16 - 32
  • [4] Examining Bloom’s Taxonomy in Multiple Choice Questions: Students’ Approach to Questions
    J. K. Stringer
    Sally A. Santen
    Eun Lee
    Meagan Rawls
    Jean Bailey
    Alicia Richards
    Robert A. Perera
    Diane Biskobing
    Medical Science Educator, 2021, 31 : 1311 - 1317
  • [5] Examining Bloom's Taxonomy in Multiple Choice Questions: Students' Approach to Questions
    Stringer, J. K.
    Santen, Sally A.
    Lee, Eun
    Rawls, Meagan
    Bailey, Jean
    Richards, Alicia
    Perera, Robert A.
    Biskobing, Diane
    MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2021, 31 (04) : 1311 - 1317
  • [6] On Flexible Multiple Choice Questions With Parameters
    Schwinning, Nils
    Striewe, Michael
    Savija, Marinko
    Goedicke, Michael
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON R-LEARNING (ECEL 2015), 2015, : 523 - 529
  • [7] EMPOWERING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS THROUGH ONLINE MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
    Biggins, D.
    Bolat, E.
    Crowley, E.
    Dogan, H.
    Dupac, M.
    ICERI2016: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2016, : 4187 - 4193
  • [8] Feedback, fairness, and validity: effects of disclosing and reusing multiple-choice questions in medical schools
    Appelhaus, Stefan
    Werner, Susanne
    Grosse, Pascal
    Kaemmer, Juliane E.
    MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2023, 28 (01):
  • [9] Distractor Quality Evaluation in Multiple Choice Questions
    Pho, Van-Minh
    Ligozat, Anne-Laure
    Grau, Brigitte
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, AIED 2015, 2015, 9112 : 377 - 386
  • [10] GUIDELINES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS TESTS
    Al-Rukban, Mohammed O.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (03) : 125 - 133