Factors Associated With Emergency Department Visits: A Multistate Analysis of Adult Fee-for-Service Medicaid Beneficiaries

被引:10
作者
Agarwal, Parul [1 ]
Bias, Thomas K. [2 ]
Madhavan, Suresh [1 ]
Sambamoorthi, Nethra [3 ]
Frisbee, Stephanie [2 ]
Sambamoorthi, Usha [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Syst & Policy, Morgantown, WV 26501 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Leadership, Morgantown, WV 26501 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Sch Profess Studies, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
access to care; emergency visits; primary care; community health; medical cost;
D O I
10.1177/2333392816648549
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the association of patient- and county-level factors with the emergency department (ED) visits among adult fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid beneficiaries residing in Maryland, Ohio, and West Virginia. Methods: A cross-sectional design using retrospective observational data was implemented. Patient-level data were obtained from 2010 Medicaid Analytic extract files. Information on county-level health-care resources was obtained from the Area Health Resource file and County Health Rankings file. Results: In adjusted analyses, the following patient-level factors were associated with higher number of ED visits: African Americans (incidence rate ratios [IRR] = 1.47), Hispanics (IRR = 1.63), polypharmacy (IRR = 1.89), and tobacco use (IRR = 2.23). Patients with complex chronic illness had a higher number of ED visits (IRR = 3.33). The county-level factors associated with ED visits were unemployment rate (IRR = 0.94) and number of urgent care clinics (IRR = 0.96). Conclusion: Patients with complex healthcare needs had a higher number of ED visits as compared to those without complex healthcare needs. The study results provide important baseline context for future policy analysis studies around Medicaid expansion options.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
AHRQ, 2012, EM ROOM SERV MEAN ME
[2]  
Allison P., DO WE REALLY NEED ZE
[3]   REVISITING THE BEHAVIORAL-MODEL AND ACCESS TO MEDICAL-CARE - DOES IT MATTER [J].
ANDERSEN, RM .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1995, 36 (01) :1-10
[4]   Successful Tobacco Dependence Treatment in Low-Income Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Trial [J].
Bernstein, Steven L. ;
D'Onofrio, Gail ;
Rosner, June ;
O'Malley, Stephanie ;
Makuch, Robert ;
Busch, Susan ;
Pantalon, Michael V. ;
Toll, Benjamin .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 66 (02) :140-147
[5]   A descriptive study of heavy emergency department users at an academic emergency department reveals heavy ED users have better access to care than average users [J].
Blank, FSJ ;
Li, HP ;
Henneman, PL ;
Smithline, HA ;
Santoro, JS ;
Provost, D ;
Maynard, AM .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2005, 31 (02) :139-144
[6]  
CDC, 2014, EM DEP VIS
[7]   ECONOMIC BURDEN OF NOT RECOGNIZING PANIC DISORDER IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
Coley, Kim C. ;
Saul, Melissa I. ;
Seybert, Amy L. .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 36 (01) :3-7
[8]   Repeat patients to the emergency department in a Statewide database [J].
Cook, LJ ;
Knight, S ;
Junkins, EP ;
Mann, NC ;
Dean, JM ;
Olson, LM .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (03) :256-263
[9]   What accounts for differences in the use of hospital emergency departments across US communities? [J].
Cunningham, Peter J. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (05) :W324-W336
[10]   The association of psychiatric comorbidity and use of the emergency department among persons with substance use disorders: An observational cohort study [J].
Curran G.M. ;
Sullivan G. ;
Williams K. ;
Han X. ;
Allee E. ;
Kotrla K.J. .
BMC Emergency Medicine, 8 (1)