Multi-Domain Simulation Model of a Wheel Loader

被引:2
|
作者
Saha, Rohit [1 ]
Hwang, Long-Kung [1 ]
Kumar, Mahesh Madurai [1 ]
Zhao, Yunfeng [2 ]
Yu, Chen [2 ]
Ransijn, Bob [3 ]
机构
[1] Cummins Inc, 1900 Mckinley Ave,MC 50040, Columbus, IN 47201 USA
[2] Guangxi Liugong Machinery Co Ltd, Liuzhou, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Siemens PLM Software Inc, Plano, TX USA
关键词
Hydraulic equipment - Hydraulic machinery - Cooling systems - Fuels - Heat exchangers - Wheels - Loaders - Engines - Hydraulics;
D O I
10.4271/2016-01-8055
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Wheel loader subsystems are multi-domain in nature, including controls, mechanisms, hydraulics, and thermal. This paper describes the process of developing a multi-domain simulation of a wheel loader. Working hydraulics, kinematics of the working tool, driveline, engine, and cooling system are modeled in LMS Imagine. Lab Amesim. Contacts between boom/bucket and bucket/ground are defined to constrain the movement of the bucket and boom. The wheel loader has four heat exchangers: charge air cooler, radiator, transmission oil cooler, and hydraulic oil cooler. Heat rejection from engine, energy losses from driveline, and hydraulic subsystem are inputs to the heat exchangers. 3D CFD modeling was done to calibrate airflows through heat exchangers in LMS Amesim. CFD modeling was done in ANSYS FLUENT (R) using a standard k - epsilon model with detailed fan and underhood geometry. Critical wheel loader drive cycle inputs into the model have been obtained from testing and have been used to validate the system response and cycle fuel consumption. Predicted engine speed, pump pressures, machine ground speed, and cycle fuel consumption were found to correlate with the test results. An energy distribution study shows energy losses in the respective subsystems. The model has been effectively used to identify improvements in system efficiency in terms of fuel consumption and productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 259
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and Validation of Wheel Loader Simulation Model
    Oh, Kwangseok
    Yun, Seungjae
    Kim, Hakgu
    Ko, Kyungeun
    Yi, Kyongsu
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS A, 2013, 37 (05) : 601 - 607
  • [2] Multi-domain modelling and simulation
    Goucem, A
    IEE REVIEW, 1999, 45 (02): : 85 - 87
  • [3] Techniques for simulation of multi-domain systems
    Larsson, J
    Krus, P
    Palmberg, JO
    SIXTH SCANDINAVIAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLUID POWER, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 935 - 946
  • [4] Multi-domain modelling of a new wheel rotational kinematics sensor
    Gray, J. P.
    Paldan, J. R.
    Vantsevich, V. V.
    DYNAMICS OF VEHICLES ON ROADS AND TRACKS, 2016, : 253 - 262
  • [5] Analysis of multi-domain complex simulation studies
    Gattiker, James R.
    Lawrence, Earl
    Higdon, David
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2006, PT 3, 2006, 3982 : 1153 - 1162
  • [6] MapleSim 2: Multi-domain modeling and simulation
    Wass, John A.
    Sci. Comput., 2009, 5 (20-21): : 20 - 21
  • [7] Interfacing Issues in Multi-Domain Simulation Tools
    Faruque, M. O.
    Dinavahi, V.
    Steurer, M.
    Monti, A.
    Strunz, K.
    Martinez, J. A.
    Chang, G. W.
    Jatskevich, J.
    Iravani, R.
    Davoudi, A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2012, 27 (01) : 439 - 448
  • [8] Integrated wheel loader simulation model for improving performance and energy flow
    Oh, Kwangseok
    Kim, Hakgu
    Ko, Kyungeun
    Kim, Panyoung
    Yi, Kyongsu
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 58 : 129 - 143
  • [9] A Multi-Domain Role Activation Model
    Abreu, Vilmar
    Santin, Altair O.
    Viegas, Eduardo K.
    Stihler, Maicon
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (ICC), 2017,
  • [10] A solution for improved simulation efficiency of a multi-domain marine power system model
    Schuddebeurs J.D.
    Norman P.J.
    Elders I.M.
    Galloway S.J.
    Booth C.D.
    Burt G.M.
    Apsley J.M.
    International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 2010, 6 (01) : 67 - 77