On the Power-of-d-choices with Least Loaded Server Selection

被引:33
作者
Hellemans, Tim [1 ]
Van Houdt, Benny [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Middelheimlaan 1, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Scheduling; redundancy; late binding; large-scale systems;
D O I
10.1145/3224422
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Motivated by distributed schedulers that combine the power-of-d-choices with late binding and systems that use replication with cancellation-on-start, we study the performance of the LL(d) policy which assigns a job to a server that currently has the least workload among d randomly selected servers in large-scale homogeneous clusters. We consider general job size distributions and propose a partial integro-differential equation to describe the evolution of the system. This equation relies on the earlier proven ansatz for LL(d) which asserts that the workload distribution of any finite set of queues becomes independent of one another as the number of servers tends to infinity. Based on this equation we propose a fixed point iteration for the limiting workload distribution and study its convergence. For exponential job sizes we present a simple closed form expression for the limiting workload distribution that is valid for any work-conserving service discipline as well as for the limiting response time distribution in case of first-come-first-served scheduling. We further show that for phase-type distributed job sizes the limiting workload and response time distribution can be expressed via the unique solution of a simple set of ordinary differential equations. Numerical and analytical results that compare response time of the classic power-of-d-choices algorithm and the LL(d) policy are also presented and the accuracy of the limiting response time distribution for finite systems is illustrated using simulations.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Abramowitz M., 1984, HDB MATH FUNCTIONS F
[2]   The PDE method for the analysis of randomized load balancing networks [J].
Aghajani, Reza ;
Li, Xingjie ;
Ramanan, Kavita .
Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 2017, 1 (02)
[3]   Balanced allocations [J].
Azar, Y ;
Broder, AZ ;
Karlin, AR ;
Upfal, E .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 1999, 29 (01) :180-200
[4]   Queues with workload-dependent arrival and service rates [J].
Bekker, R ;
Borst, SC ;
Boxma, OJ ;
Kella, O .
QUEUEING SYSTEMS, 2004, 46 (3-4) :537-556
[5]   DECAY OF TAILS AT EQUILIBRIUM FOR FIFO JOIN THE SHORTEST QUEUE NETWORKS [J].
Bramson, Maury ;
Lu, Yi ;
Prabhakar, Balaji .
ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2013, 23 (05) :1841-1878
[6]   Asymptotic independence of queues under randomized load balancing [J].
Bramson, Maury ;
Lu, Yi ;
Prabhakar, Balaji .
QUEUEING SYSTEMS, 2012, 71 (03) :247-292
[7]   STABILITY OF JOIN THE SHORTEST QUEUE NETWORKS [J].
Bramson, Maury .
ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2011, 21 (04) :1568-1625
[8]  
Bramson M, 2010, PERF E R SI, V38, P275, DOI 10.1145/1811099.1811071
[9]  
Driver R.D., 1977, ORDINARY DELAY DIFFE, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4684-9467-9, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-9467-9]
[10]   On the stability of a partially accessible multi-station queue with state-dependent routing [J].
Foss, S ;
Chernova, N .
QUEUEING SYSTEMS, 1998, 29 (01) :55-73