LOCAL DENERVATION ATROPHY OF PARASPINAL MUSCLES IN POSTOPERATIVE FAILED BACK SYNDROME

被引:525
作者
SIHVONEN, T
HERNO, A
PALJARVI, L
AIRAKSINEN, O
PARTANEN, J
TAPANINAHO, A
机构
[1] Departments of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Hospital, Kuopio
[2] Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Kuopio
[3] Departments of Pathology, University Hospital, Kuopio
[4] Departments of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Kuopio
关键词
Back muscle; Dorsal ramus; EMG; Low back pain;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199304000-00009
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Impairment and disability after back surgery is a common diagnostic and therapeutic problem. For the most part the reasons are unclear. Of 178 patients who had undergone laminectomies 2-5 years earlier, 14 patients with good recovery and 21 patients with poor recovery but no evidence of restenosis on computed tomography were selected by the Oswestry index. According to radiologic, neurophysiologic, and muscle biopsy evidence most patients (13 of 15 studied) suffering from the severe postoperative failed back syndrome had dorsal ramus lesions in one or more segments covered by the scar and local paraspinal muscle atrophy at the corresponding segments. Disturbed back muscle innervation and loss of muscular support leads to the disability and increased biomechanical strain and might be one important cause to the failed back syndrome. It may be possible to develop operating techniques that save back muscle innervation better than the usual ones.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 581
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Alaranta H., Factors Defining Impairment, Disability and Handicap in a Population of Patients Examined One Year Following Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation, 25, (1985)
  • [2] Bogduk N., The lumbar mamilloaccessory ligament. Its anatomical and neurosurgical significance, Spine, 6, pp. 162-167, (1981)
  • [3] Bogduk N., Wilson A.S., Tynan W., The human lumbar dorsal rami, J Anat, 134, pp. 383-397, (1982)
  • [4] Burton C.V., Clinical Review of the Failed Back Surgery Syndrome. Spine Update 1987, pp. 247-252, (1987)
  • [5] Dubowitz V., Muscle Biopsy. A Practical Approach, pp. 19-34, (1987)
  • [6] Haig A.J., Moffroid M., Henry S., Haugh L., Pope M., A technique for needle localisation in paraspinal muscle with cadaveric confirmation, Muscle and Nerve, 14, pp. 521-526, (1991)
  • [7] Henriksson K.G., Semi-open’ muscle biopsy technique: A simple outpatient procedure, Acta Neurol Scand, 59, pp. 317-323, (1979)
  • [8] Lehto M., Hurme M., Alaranta H., Et al., Connective tissue changes of the multifidus muscle in patients with lumbar disc herniation: An immunohistologic study of collagen types 1 and 111 and fibronectin, Spine, 14, pp. 302-309, (1989)
  • [9] Mabuchi K., Actomyosin S.F., ATPase. II. Fiber typing by histochemical ATPase reaction, Muscle and Nerve, 3, pp. 233-239, (1980)
  • [10] Macintosh J.E., Bogduk N., The morphology of the lumbar erector spinae, Spine, 12, pp. 658-668, (1987)