Evaluation of the uterine cavity by magnetic resonance imaging, three dimensional hysterosonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in women with pre- and post-menopausal bleeding

被引:3
作者
Ahmad, Reda A. [1 ]
Sadek, Somayya M. [1 ]
Ragheb, Ahmad S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Fac Med, Zagazig, Egypt
关键词
Uterus; Premenopausal; Postmenopausal bleeding; MRI; 3D hysterosonography; Hysteroscopy;
D O I
10.1016/j.mefs.2014.05.002
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the diagnostic potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), three dimensional (3D) hysterosonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in evaluation of the uterine cavity in women with premenopausal and postmenopausal bleeding. Design: Comparative study. Setting: Zagazig University hospital. Materials and methods: 30 patients with premenopausal bleeding and 30 patients with postmenopausal bleeding scheduled for hysterectomy were submitted to MRI, 3D hysterosonography and hysteroscopy to evaluate the endometrial cavity. Results were compared with histopathologic examination at hysterectomy (the gold standard). Results: In the premenopausal group; the sensitivity of MRI was 71.43%, 3D hysterosonography 85.71% and hysteroscopy 80.95%, the specificity of MRI was 55.56%, 3D hysterosonography 66.67% and hysteroscopy 88.89% and the degree of agreement with histopathology was 0.47 for MRI, 0.65 for 3D hysterosonography and 0.73 for hysteroscopy (P =.000, 0.000 and 0.000, respectively). In the postmenopausal group; the sensitivity of MRI was 88.24%, 3D hysterosonography 88.24% and hysteroscopy 88.24%, the specificity of MRI was 69.23%, 3D hysterosonography 84.61% and hysteroscopy 84.61% and the degree of agreement with histopathology was 0.60 for MRI, 0.72 for 3D hysterosonography and 0.73 for hysteroscopy (P =.000, 0.000 and 0.000, respectively) and for both groups; the sensitivity of MRI was 78.75%, 3D hysterosonography 86.84% and hysteroscopy 84.21%, the specificity of MRI was 63.64%, 3D hysterosonography 77.27% and hysteroscopy 86.36% and the degree of agreement with histopathology was 0.54 for MRI, 0.69 for 3D hysterosonography and 0.73 for hysteroscopy (P =.000, 0.000 and 0.000, respectively). Conclusions: Hysteroscopy is the best method in evaluation of uterine cavity in women with premenopausal and post menopausal bleeding; but more invasive. MRI is the best method for detection of submucous myoma especially when the cavity is large or tumor is small. (C) 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Middle East Fertility Society.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 78
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Value of 3-Dimensional Sonohysterography for Detection of Intrauterine Lesions in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding [J].
Abou-Salem, Nermeen ;
Elmazny, Akmal ;
El-Sherbiny, Walid .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) :200-204
[2]  
American College of Radiology
[3]  
ACR Appropriateness Criteria, 2010, ACR APPR CRIT 2010 A
[4]  
Bani-Irshaid I., 2011, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, V17, P582
[5]   Three-dimensional hysterosonography for the study of endometrial tumors: Comparison with conventional transvaginal sonography, hysterosalpingography, and hysteroscopy [J].
BonillaMusoles, F ;
Raga, F ;
Osborne, NG ;
Blanes, J ;
Coelho, F .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 65 (02) :245-252
[6]   Differential diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding [J].
Brenner, PF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (03) :766-769
[7]   Comparison of transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine cavity pathologies [J].
Cepni, I ;
Ocal, P ;
Erkan, S ;
Saricali, FS ;
Akbas, H ;
Demirkiran, F ;
Idil, M ;
Bese, T .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 45 (01) :30-35
[8]   Outpatient hysteroscopy and ultrasonography in the management of endometrial disease [J].
Clark, TJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 16 (04) :305-311
[9]   Reproducibility of evaluation of the uterus by transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, hysteroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Dueholm, M ;
Lundorf, E ;
Sorensen, JS ;
Ledertoug, S ;
Olesen, F ;
Laursen, H .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (01) :195-200
[10]   Evaluation of the uterine cavity with magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, and diagnostic hysteroscopy [J].
Dueholm, M ;
Lundorf, E ;
Hansen, ES ;
Ledertoug, S ;
Olesen, F .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (02) :350-357