Systems biology and the integration of mechanistic explanation and mathematical explanation

被引:57
作者
Brigandt, Ingo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Philosophy, 2-40 Assiniboia Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E7, Canada
关键词
Systems biology; Integration; Mechanistic explanation; Mathematical models; Mechanisms;
D O I
10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.06.002
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
The paper discusses how systems biology is working toward complex accounts that integrate explanation in terms of mechanisms and explanation by mathematical models-which some philosophers have viewed as rival models of explanation. Systems biology is an integrative approach, and it strongly relies on mathematical modeling. Philosophical accounts of mechanisms capture integrative in the sense of multilevel and multifield explanations, yet accounts of mechanistic explanation (as the analysis of a whole in terms of its structural parts and their qualitative interactions) have failed to address how a mathematical model could contribute to such explanations. I discuss how mathematical equations can be explanatorily relevant. Several cases from systems biology are discussed to illustrate the interplay between mechanistic research and mathematical modeling, and I point to questions about qualitative phenomena (rather than the explanation of quantitative details), where quantitative models are still indispensable to the explanation. Systems biology shows that a broader philosophical conception of mechanisms is needed, which takes into account functional-dynamical aspects, interaction in complex networks with feedback loops, system-wide functional properties such as distributed functionality and robustness, and a mechanism's ability to respond to perturbations (beyond its actual operation). I offer general conclusions for philosophical accounts of explanation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 492
页数:16
相关论文
共 165 条
[61]  
FELL DA, 2007, SYSTEMS BIOL PHILOS, P87
[62]   Modeling the Cell Cycle: Why Do Certain Circuits Oscillate? [J].
Ferrell, James E., Jr. ;
Tsai, Tony Yu-Chen ;
Yang, Qiong .
CELL, 2011, 144 (06) :874-885
[63]   Predictive Modeling of signaling crosstalk during C-elegans vulval development [J].
Fisher, Jasmin ;
Piterman, Nir ;
Hajnal, Alex ;
Henzinger, Thomas A. .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 3 (05) :862-873
[64]   Navigating the network: signaling cross-talk in hematopoietic cells [J].
Fraser, Iain D. C. ;
Germain, Ronald N. .
NATURE IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 10 (04) :327-331
[65]  
Fu P., 2009, SYSTEMS BIOL SYNTHET
[66]   A mathematical model of caspase function in apoptosis [J].
Fussenegger, M ;
Bailey, JE ;
Varner, J .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2000, 18 (07) :768-774
[67]  
Gerson E. M., 2013, STUD HIST PHILOS M P, V44, P514
[68]   Rethinking mechanistic explanation [J].
Glennan, S .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2002, 69 (03) :S342-S353
[69]   Modeling the segmentation clock as a network of coupled oscillations in the Notch, Wnt and FGF signaling pathways [J].
Goldbeter, Albert ;
Pourquie, Olivier .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 252 (03) :574-585
[70]   When one model is not enough: Combining epistemic tools in systems biology [J].
Green, Sara .
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES, 2013, 44 (02) :170-180