Systems biology and the integration of mechanistic explanation and mathematical explanation

被引:56
作者
Brigandt, Ingo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Philosophy, 2-40 Assiniboia Hall, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E7, Canada
关键词
Systems biology; Integration; Mechanistic explanation; Mathematical models; Mechanisms;
D O I
10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.06.002
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
The paper discusses how systems biology is working toward complex accounts that integrate explanation in terms of mechanisms and explanation by mathematical models-which some philosophers have viewed as rival models of explanation. Systems biology is an integrative approach, and it strongly relies on mathematical modeling. Philosophical accounts of mechanisms capture integrative in the sense of multilevel and multifield explanations, yet accounts of mechanistic explanation (as the analysis of a whole in terms of its structural parts and their qualitative interactions) have failed to address how a mathematical model could contribute to such explanations. I discuss how mathematical equations can be explanatorily relevant. Several cases from systems biology are discussed to illustrate the interplay between mechanistic research and mathematical modeling, and I point to questions about qualitative phenomena (rather than the explanation of quantitative details), where quantitative models are still indispensable to the explanation. Systems biology shows that a broader philosophical conception of mechanisms is needed, which takes into account functional-dynamical aspects, interaction in complex networks with feedback loops, system-wide functional properties such as distributed functionality and robustness, and a mechanism's ability to respond to perturbations (beyond its actual operation). I offer general conclusions for philosophical accounts of explanation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 492
页数:16
相关论文
共 165 条
  • [1] Shaping developing tissues by apoptosis
    Abud, HE
    [J]. CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION, 2004, 11 (08) : 797 - 799
  • [2] The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster
    Albert, R
    Othmer, HG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 223 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [3] Alon U., 2007, INTRO SYSTEMS BIOL, DOI 10.1201/9781420011432
  • [4] Baetu T., EXPLANATION BIOL ENQ
  • [5] Bistability in apoptosis: Roles of Bax, Bcl-2, and mitochondrial permeability transition pores
    Bagci, EZ
    Vodovotz, Y
    Billiar, TR
    Ermentrout, GB
    Bahar, I
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 90 (05) : 1546 - 1559
  • [6] Network Features of the Mammalian Circadian Clock
    Baggs, Julie E.
    Price, Tom S.
    DiTacchio, Luciano
    Panda, Satchidananda
    FitzGerald, Garret A.
    Hogenesch, John B.
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2009, 7 (03): : 563 - 575
  • [7] Mathematical models for somite formation
    Baker, Ruth E.
    Schnell, Santiago
    Maini, Philip K.
    [J]. MULTISCALE MODELING OF DEVELOPMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 81 : 183 - 203
  • [8] How can mathematics help us explore vertebrate segmentation?
    Baker, Ruth E.
    Schnell, Santiago
    [J]. HFSP JOURNAL, 2009, 3 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [9] Network biology:: Understanding the cell's functional organization
    Barabási, AL
    Oltvai, ZN
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2004, 5 (02) : 101 - U15
  • [10] Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease
    Barabasi, Albert-Laszlo
    Gulbahce, Natali
    Loscalzo, Joseph
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2011, 12 (01) : 56 - 68