DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND THE POSTDIVORCE FAMILY: IMPLICATIONS OF A PARADIGM SHIFT

被引：28
作者：
Singer, Jana B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Law, Law, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Amer Law Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Amer Bar Assoc, Commiss Women Profess, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源：
FAMILY COURT REVIEW | 2009年 / 47卷 / 03期
关键词：
Family law; family courts; mediation; alternative dispute resolution; joint custody; therapeutic jurisprudence;
D O I：
10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01261.x
中图分类号：
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号：
1204 ;
摘要：
Over the past two decades, there has been a paradigm shift in the way the legal system handles most family disputes-particularly disputes involving children. This paradigm shift has replaced the conventional model of adjudication with a more collaborative, interdisciplinary, and forward-looking family dispute resolution regime. It has also transformed the practice of family law and fundamentally altered the way in which disputing families interact with the legal system. This essay examines the elements of this paradigm shift in family dispute resolution and explores the opportunities and challenges it offers for families, children, and the legal system.
引用
收藏
页码：363 / 370
页数：8
相关论文
共 62 条
[31]  
Huntington C, 2006, UCLA LAW REV, V53, P637
[32]  
Johnston J. R., 1995, FAM CONCILIATION CTS, V33, P415, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.174-1617.1995.TB00386.X
[33]  
Johnston Janet R., 1995, FAM CONCILIATION CTS, V33, P427
[34]  
JOHNSTON JR, 1995, FAM CONCILIATION CTS, V33, P419
[35]  
Lande John, 2004, FAM CT REV, V42, P280
[36]  
MACCOBY ELEANOR E., 1992, DIVIDING CHILD SOCIA, P164
[37]  
Parkinson P., 2006, CHILD FAMILY LAW Q, V18, P157
[38]  
Peeples R. A., 2008, WAKE FOREST L REV, V43, P505
[39]  
Peeples Ralph A., 2008, WAKE FOREST L REV, V43, P516
[40]  
Reynolds Suzanne, 2007, NC L REV, V85, P1629
1234567