Effects of two methods of fentanyl bolus administration during remifentanil-based anesthesia on pain in the immediate postoperative period

被引:0
作者
Koda, Fumio [1 ]
Maruyama, Noboru [1 ]
Sekimoto, Kenichi [2 ]
Saito, Shigeru [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org, Takasaki Gen Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesia, 36 Takamatsu Cho, Takasaki, Gunma 3700829, Japan
[2] Gunma Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
关键词
Postoperative analgesia; Remifentanil; Fentanyl; Pain;
D O I
10.11154/pain.26.169
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To determine which method provides superior pain relief and recovery from anesthesia while minimizing adverse effects in the immediate postoperative period. Methods. We studied 70 patients undergoing gynecologic laparotomy. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil. After tracheal intubation facilitated with vecuronium or rocuronium, anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and remifentanil. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 mu g/kg of fentanyl at the start of surgery (early-bolus group) or 6 mu g/kg of fentanyl at 60min before the anticipated end of surgery (late-bolus group). At the end of surgery, the times from discontinuation of sevoflurane until patient response to verbal commands and until extubation were recorded as indicators of recovery from anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters, pain score, sedation grade, and incidence of side effects were evaluated at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after entering the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Results. A longer recovery time from anesthesia was required in the late-bolus group compared with the early-bolus group, whereas mean pain score was significantly lower in the late-bolus group compared with the early-bolus group. Furthermore, mean dose of fentanyl administered in the PACU was significantly higher in the early-bolus group compared with the late-bolus group. Sedation grade and incidence of adverse effects were similar between the groups. Conclusion. Administration of 6 mu g/kg fentanyl at 60min before the anticipated end of surgery during remifentanil-based anesthesia provided superior postoperative analgesia in the immediate postoperative period as compared with 8 mu g/kg fentanyl administered at the start of surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Albrecht S, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS40, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00008
[2]   THE EFFECTS OF PETHIDINE, FENTANYL AND LIGNOCAINE ON POSTANESTHETIC SHIVERING [J].
ALFONSI, P ;
HONGNAT, JM ;
LEBRAULT, C ;
CHAUVIN, M .
ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 (03) :214-217
[3]   A multicenter evaluation of remifentanil for early postoperative analgesia [J].
Bowdle, TA ;
Camporesi, EM ;
Maysick, L ;
Hogue, CW ;
Miguel, RV ;
Pitts, M ;
Streisand, JB .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (06) :1292-1297
[4]   Postoperative analgesic effects of three demand-dose sizes of fentanyl administered by patient-controlled analgesia [J].
Camu, F ;
Van Aken, H ;
Bovill, JG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (04) :890-895
[5]   Evaluation of morphine versus fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after ambulatory surgical procedures [J].
Claxton, AR ;
McGuire, G ;
Chung, F ;
Cruise, C .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (03) :509-514
[6]   Influence of peroperative opioid on postoperative pain after major abdominal surgery: sufentanil TCI versus remifentanil TCI. A randomized, controlled study [J].
Derrode, N ;
Lebrun, F ;
Levron, JC ;
Chauvin, M ;
Debaene, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (06) :842-849
[7]   The efficacy of intravenous 0.15 versus 0.25 mg/kg intraoperative morphine for immediate postoperative analgesia after remifentanil-based anesthesia for major surgery [J].
Fletcher, D ;
Pinaud, M ;
Scherpereel, P ;
Clyti, N ;
Chauvin, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (03) :666-671
[8]  
Glass PSA, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS7, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00003
[9]   Acute opioid tolerance - Intraoperative remifentanil increases postoperative pain and morphine requirement [J].
Guignard, B ;
Bossard, AE ;
Coste, C ;
Sessler, DI ;
Lebrault, C ;
Alfonsi, P ;
Fletcher, D ;
Chauvin, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (02) :409-417
[10]  
Hagihira S., 2006, J JAPAN SOC CLIN ANE, V26, P638