DOSE INTENSIFICATION OF ETOPOSIDE IN THE BEAM ABMT PROTOCOL FOR MALIGNANT-LYMPHOMA

被引:24
作者
MILLS, W [1 ]
STRANG, J [1 ]
GOLDSTONE, AH [1 ]
LINCH, DC [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL HOSP, DEPT HAEMATOL, LONDON WC1 6AU, ENGLAND
关键词
LYMPHOMA; BEAM; VP16; ESCALATION;
D O I
10.3109/10428199509056831
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We have previously demonstrated a dose response relationship in Hodgkin's disease for the combination of BCNU, VP16, Ara C and Melphalan, with the superior efficacy of the BEAM regimen requiring haemopoietic support, compared with miniBEAM.(1,2) To further exploit this, we have attempted to escalate the VP16 dose in BEAM. The standard etoposide dose is 200 mg/m(2) IV for four days. Thirty seven patients with refractory lymphoma received 400 mg/m(2)/day of etoposide, and 13 patients 600 mg/m(2)/day, in addition to BCNU, cytarabine, and melphalan. Toxicity and outcome parameters were compared in the preceeding 40 patients, who received 200 mg/m(2)/day etoposide. The toxic mortality with 400 mg/m(2)/day of etoposide (3%) was identical to that for the standard BEAM regimen (5%). Two procedure related deaths occurred in the highest VP16 dose group (15%). The morbidity of the lower etoposide dose regimens was comparable, but 600 mg/m(2)/day induced significantly greater gastrointestinal toxicity. Twelve of the 13 patients receiving this dose suffered grade II-IV mucositis, with stomatitis, dysphagia and prolonged diarrhoea; 5 haemodynamically significant gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and 1 fatal toxic colitis. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor did not influence the nonhaematological toxicity. The three month response rates were similar (91%) in all dose cohorts. The maximum tolerable etoposide dose within the BEAM regimen is thus 400 mg/m(2) for four days.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 270
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Linch D.C., Winfield D., Goldstone A.H., Et al., Dose intensification is effective in relapsed or resistant Hodgkin's Disease: Results of the BNLI randomised study, Lancet., 341, pp. 138-142, (1993)
[2]  
Chopra R., Linch D.C., McMillan A.K., Et al., MiniBEAM plus BEAM ABMT as salvage treatment for very poor prognosis Hodgkin's Disease, Br. J. Haem., 77, (1991)
[3]  
Pusey W.A., Cases of sarcoma and of Hodgkin's disease treated by exposure to X rays: A preliminary report, JAMA, 38, (1902)
[4]  
Kaplan H.S., Hodgkin's disease Biology, treatment and prognosis, Blood, 57, (1981)
[5]  
De Vila V.T., Simon R.M., Hubbard S.M., Et al., Curability of advanced Hodgkin's Disease with chemotherapy: Long term follow up of MOPP treated patients at the NCI, Ann. Intern. Med., 92, pp. 587-595, (1980)
[6]  
De Vita V.T., Serpick A.A., Carbone P.P., Combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin' s disease, Ann. Intern. Med, 78, (1970)
[7]  
Longo D.L., Young R.C., Wesley M., Et al., Twenty years of MOPP chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease, J. Clin. Oncol., 4, (1986)
[8]  
Klimo P., Connors J.M., An update of the Vancouver experience in the management of advanced Hodgkin's disease treated with the MOPP/ABVD hybrid program, Sent, in Haematol., 25, (1988)
[9]  
Cannellos G.P., Anderson J.R., Propert K.J., Et al., Chemotherapy of advanced Hodgkin's Disease with MOPP, ABVD or MOPP alternating with ABVD, N. Eng. J. Med., 327, pp. 1478-1484, (1992)
[10]  
Goldstone A.H., Linch D.C., Bone marrow transplantation in the malignant lymphomas, Recent Advances in Haematology, (1992)