The use of online social networks as a promotional tool for self-administered internet surveys

被引:0
作者
Diaz de Rada, Vidal [1 ]
Casalo Arino, Luis V. [2 ]
Guinaliu Blasco, Miguel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Publ Navarra, Dept Sociol, Campus Arrosadia S-N, Pamplona 31006, Spain
[2] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Direcc Mkt & Invest Mercados, Fac Econ & Empresa, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
来源
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SOCIOLOGIA | 2016年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
Social networks; internet surveys; self-administered survey;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of a research carried out in Spain to obtain information about online consumer behavior in the tourism sector, employing a survey conducted through the Internet. Researches carried out through the Internet frequently use volunteers instead of the random and equiprobable selection used in other surveys, which means that the possibilities of generalizing the results are limited. In order to try to reduce this problem as much as possible, it is usual to conduct extensive promotional campaigns of online surveys using banners and mailing lists, and offering incentives to participants. This paper also uses an online communication tool that is becoming increasingly important: online social networks. All these tools have been used in the promotion of the survey, which has allowed us to obtain a number of replies that considerably increases the representativeness of the sample.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 203
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AIMC-Asociacion para la investigacion de los medios de comunicacion, 2009, AUD INT SEG EGM
  • [2] Cooperative Survey Research
    Ansolabehere, Stephen
    Rivers, Douglas
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 16, 2013, 16 : 307 - 329
  • [3] Open source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups
    Bagozzi, Richard P.
    Dholakia, Utpal M.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (07) : 1099 - 1115
  • [4] ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH
    BAGOZZI, RP
    LI, YJ
    PHILLIPS, LW
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) : 421 - 458
  • [5] Bech M., 2009, SURV RES METHODS-GER, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.18148/SRM/2009.V3I1.592
  • [6] Blasius J, 2010, B SOCIOLOGICAL METHO, V107, P5, DOI [10.1177/0759106310369964, DOI 10.1177/0759106310369964]
  • [7] A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe
    Blom, Annelies G.
    Bosnjak, Michael
    Cornilleau, Anne
    Cousteaux, Anne-Sophie
    Das, Marcel
    Douhou, Salima
    Krieger, Ulrich
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2016, 34 (01) : 8 - 25
  • [8] Sponsor Prominence and Responses Patterns to an Online Survey
    Boulianne, Shelley
    Klofstad, Casey A.
    Basson, Danna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2011, 23 (01) : 79 - 87
  • [9] Individual differences in motivation to participate in online panels The effect on response rate and response quality perceptions
    Bruggen, Elisabeth
    Wetzels, Martin
    de Ruyter, Ko
    Schillewaert, Niels
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2011, 53 (03) : 369 - 390
  • [10] Callegaro M., 2015, WEB SURVEY METHODOLO, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781529799651