Prospective Swiss pilot study of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in a screening population

被引:12
作者
Sawatzki, Mikael [1 ]
Meyenberger, Christa [1 ]
Marbet, Urs Albert [2 ]
Haarer, Johannes [1 ]
Frei, Remus [1 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Kantonsspital Uri, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Altdorf, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1391418
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is one of the quality measures in screening colonoscopy and is crucial for reducing colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality. Up to 25% of adenomas are missed during colonoscopy. Endocuff is an easy-to-use device that is attached like a cap to the distal tip of the colonoscope in order to optimize visualization behind the folds of the colon and increase the ADR. This is the first prospective study of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EC) in a screening population with follow-up to determine the ADR and adverse events of EC. Patients and methods: We prospectively enrolled asymptomatic patients referred for screening colonoscopy during the 4-month study period. We documented the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, cecal intubation rate, polyp detection rate, ADR, number of advanced adenomas, and number of adverse events. Colonoscopies were performed by five board-certified gastroenterologists. During follow-up, the patients were called 4 to 12 weeks after EC. Results: A total of 104 EC procedures were performed. Cecal intubation was achieved in 99% of the patients, with a median intubation time of 6 minutes. The polyp detection rate and ADR in our study were 72% and 47%, respectively, and 13.5% of the lesions were advanced adenomas. A significant number of adenomas were detected in the right side of the colon. Considering all the adenomas and hyperplastic polyps above the sigmoid, we recommended that nearly 60% of our patients repeat an endoscopic follow-up according to the existing Swiss guidelines. We noted no perforations or other serious adverse events, even in the patients with extensive diverticulosis. Conclusions: EC is feasible with the most commonly available colonoscopes without severe adverse events. EC seems to be a safe and effective device for increasing the ADR, including small adenomas in the right side of the colon. Therefore, this technique may be recommended in the future to increase the ADR in a screening population.
引用
收藏
页码:E236 / E239
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3)
    Adler, Andreas
    Wegscheider, Karl
    Lieberman, David
    Aminalai, Alireza
    Aschenbeck, Jens
    Drossel, Rolf
    Mayr, Michael
    Mross, Michael
    Scheel, Mathias
    Schroeder, Andreas
    Gerber, Katharina
    Stange, Gabriela
    Roll, Stephanie
    Gauger, Ulrich
    Wiedenmann, Bertram
    Altenhofen, Lutz
    Rosch, Thomas
    [J]. GUT, 2013, 62 (02) : 236 - 241
  • [2] Biecker E, 2014, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL
  • [3] Criblez D., 2007, FORUM MED SUISSE, V7, P994
  • [4] Dawwas MF, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P2539, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1309086, 10.1056/NEJMc1405329]
  • [5] Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy
    Dik, Vincent K.
    Moons, Leon M. G.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (09) : 2200 - 2211
  • [6] Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial
    Gralnek, Ian M.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    Halpern, Zamir
    Segol, Ori
    Melhem, Alaa
    Suissa, Alain
    Santo, Erwin
    Sloyer, Alan
    Fenster, Jay
    Moons, Leon M. G.
    Dik, Vincent K.
    D'Agostino, Ralph B., Jr.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (03) : 353 - 360
  • [7] Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer
    Kaminski, Michal F.
    Regula, Jaroslaw
    Kraszewska, Ewa
    Polkowski, Marcin
    Wojciechowska, Urszula
    Didkowska, Joanna
    Zwierko, Maria
    Rupinski, Maciej
    Nowacki, Marek P.
    Butruk, Eugeniusz
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (19) : 1795 - 1803
  • [8] Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England
    Lee, T. J. W.
    Blanks, R. G.
    Rees, C. J.
    Wright, K. C.
    Nickerson, C.
    Moss, S. M.
    Chilton, A.
    Goddard, A. F.
    Patnick, J.
    McNally, R. J. Q.
    Rutter, M. D.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 45 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [9] Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a new accessory to improve adenoma detection rate? Technical aspects and first clinical experiences
    Lenze, Frank
    Beyna, Torsten
    Lenz, Philipp
    Heinzow, Hauke S.
    Hengst, Karin
    Ullerich, Hansjoerg
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (07) : 610 - 613
  • [10] Colonoscopy is the preferred colorectal cancer screening method in a population-based program
    Marbet, U. A.
    Bauerfeind, P.
    Brunner, J.
    Dorta, G.
    Valloton, J. J.
    Delco, F.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 40 (08) : 650 - 655