Science and Law. Perspectives of Co-production

被引:6
作者
Tallacchini, Mariachiara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Sci Giurid, Sede Piacenza, Via E Parmense 84, I-29122 Piacenza, Italy
来源
RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO-JOURNAL OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY | 2012年 / 1卷 / 02期
关键词
Science and Law; Co-production; EU and US Regulatory Models; Soft Law; Institutional Ethics;
D O I
10.4477/38865
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Knowledge and normativity have been always at the core of legal philosophy. However, the field of research referred to as Science and Law, as currently developed, is not well settled within legal philosophy. This contribution aims at presenting some major themes and theoretical perspectives in Science and Law, highlighting the reasons to support the "co-production" approach. The notion of co-production implies that both science and law languages mutually create themselves, concurring, in an open and never ending way, to establish meanings and arrangements both within society and the scientific community. Fundamental contemporary legal-philosophical issues may be addressed in this perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 336
页数:24
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline
    Andrianantoandro, Ernesto
    Basu, Subhayu
    Karig, David K.
    Weiss, Ron
    [J]. MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2006, 2 (1) : 2006.0028
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, HARVARD LAW REV, V108, P1481
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1990, DESCENT ICARUS
  • [4] Benessia Alice, 2012, INTECH CURA MICHAE, P73
  • [5] Berger Margaret A, 2011, FED JUD CTR REFERENC, V3rd, P11
  • [6] For David Bloor ... and beyond: A reply to David Bloor's 'Anti-Latour' - Reply to Bruno Latour
    Bloor, D
    [J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1999, 30A (01): : 131 - 136
  • [7] BREYER STEPHEN, 2011, REFERENCE MANUAL SCI, P1
  • [8] Brown J. R., 2001, WHO RULES SCI OPINIO
  • [9] BUSH V, 1990, SCI ENDLESS FRONTIER
  • [10] Caudill David S., 2011, STORIES SCI LAW LIT