Destination left ventricular assist device and end-of-life: The role of palliative medicine

被引:1
作者
Bizouarn, Philippe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Michel, Magali [4 ]
Roussel, Jean-Christian [4 ]
Treilhaud, Michele [1 ]
Trochu, Jean-Noel [4 ]
Gueffet, Jean-Pierre [4 ]
Duveau, Daniel [4 ]
机构
[1] Hop G & R Loennec, Serv Anesthsie Reanimat, F-44093 Nantes 1, France
[2] CNRS, UMR 7219, Equipe REHSEIS, F-75205 Paris 13, France
[3] Univ Paris Diderot, UMR 7219, Paris, France
[4] Hop G & R Laenec, Inst Torax, F-44093 Nantes, France
来源
MEDECINE PALLIATIVE | 2013年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
Left ventricular assist device; LVAD; Destination therapy; End-of-life; Palliative care; Preventive ethics;
D O I
10.1016/j.medpal.2013.02.006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Left ventricular assist devices are being used as destination therapy for patients with chronic end-stage heart failure who are not candidates for heart transplantation because of advanced age or comorbidities. Compared with medical therapy, use of destination therapy viewed as a palliative therapy improves survival, quality of life and functional status in appropriately selected patients. However, the complications of left ventricular assist devices can adversely influence quality of life and alter the trajectory of end-of-life, raising certain ethical challenges (e.g. withdrawal of left ventricular assist devices support) that are likely to become more complex as care teams gain experience and we have more information about patients experiences. These ethical challenges ought to be adequately addressed in clinical practice as soon as possible, for preventing conflicts related to care management in patients engaged in the destination therapy program. In this article, we advocate early implication of palliative care specialists in a multidisciplinary care approach, patient and caregiver-centered, for anticipating device-related complications, end-of-life trajectories and timing of device deactivation, sometimes requested by the patients or their surrogate decision-makers. (C) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 200
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Anderson H, 2001, PALLIATIVE MED, V15, P179
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, THORATEC CORPORATION
  • [3] When withdrawal of life-sustaining care does more than allow death to take its course: The dilemma of left ventricular assist devices
    Bramstedt, KA
    Wenger, NS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 20 (05) : 544 - 548
  • [4] Destination nowhere: A potential dilemma with ventricular assist devices
    Bramstedt, Katrina A.
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2008, 54 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [5] End-of-life decision making and implementation in recipients of a destination left ventricular assist device
    Brush, Sally
    Budge, Deborah
    Alharethi, Rami
    McCormick, Ashley J.
    MacPherson, Jane E.
    Reid, Bruce B.
    Ledford, Ian D.
    Smith, Hildegard K.
    Stoker, Sandi
    Clayson, Stephen E.
    Doty, John R.
    Caine, William T.
    Drakos, Stavros
    Kfoury, Abdallah G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 29 (12) : 1337 - 1341
  • [6] Bunzel B, 2007, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL
  • [7] Canguilhem G., 1994, ETUDES HIST PHILOS S, P389
  • [8] Chapman E, 2007, AM J CRIT CARE, V16, P72
  • [9] Ethics guidelines for destination therapy
    Dudzinski, DM
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 81 (04) : 1185 - 1188
  • [10] LVAD destination therapy: applying what we know about psychiatric evaluation and management from cardiac failure and transplant
    Eshelman, Anne K.
    Mason, Shawn
    Nemeh, Hassan
    Williams, Celeste
    [J]. HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2009, 14 (01) : 21 - 28