Reduced acute toxicity associated with the use of volumetric modulated arc therapy for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate

被引:10
作者
Hall, William A. [1 ,2 ]
Colbert, Lauren [1 ,2 ]
Nickleach, Dana [3 ]
Shelton, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Marcus, David M. [1 ,2 ]
Switchenko, Jeffrey [3 ]
Rossi, Peter J. [1 ,2 ]
Godette, Karen [1 ,2 ]
Cooper, Sherrie [1 ,2 ]
Jani, Ashesh B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Winship Canc Inst, Biostat & Bioinformat Shared Resource, Atlanta, GA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2013.01.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Novel techniques to deliver intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have resulted in improved treatment efficiency and dosimetric endpoints. We aimed to compare acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity in patients treated for adenocarcinoma of the prostate (ACP) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods and Materials: A total of 122 (71 IMRT and 51 VMAT) ACP patients treated from 2004 to 2011 with definitive external beam radiation therapy were analyzed. Dose-volume histogram endpoints (V40, V65, V70, and V75 of the bladder and rectum) were collected for each patient. Median follow-up for patients treated with VMAT was 269 days versus IMRT was 1121 days. Acute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) GI and GU toxicity scores, obtained during each weekly treatment check, were compared across cohorts. The univariate (UV) association between the covariates and outcomes was assessed and multivariable (MV) cumulative logit models were fit for each outcome. Results: Median patient age was 68 years and median prostate-specific antigen was 8.3. Both bladder and rectal V40, V65, V70, and V75 were all higher in the IMRT group versus the VMAT group (P < .05), which was likely influenced by larger planning target volumes in the IMRT group. The VMAT group had significantly lower rates of acute GU and acute GI CTCAE toxicity on UV association analysis. On MV analysis, VMAT remained independently associated with acute GU (odds ratio [OR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.44; P < .001) and GI (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-0.41; P < .001) toxicity. Conclusions: VMAT appears to be independently associated with lower rates of acute GI and GU toxicity when compared with traditional IMRT. Further exploration of toxicity improvements associated with VMAT use in the definitive treatment of ACP is needed. (C) 2013 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E157 / E164
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Impact of magnetic resonance imaging on computed tomography-based treatment planning and acute toxicity for prostate cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Ali, Arif N.
    Rossi, Peter J.
    Godette, Karen D.
    Martin, Diego
    Liauw, Stanley
    Vijayakumar, Srinivasan
    Cooper, Sherrie
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    [J]. PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 3 (01) : E1 - E9
  • [2] Rotational radiotherapy for prostate cancer in clinical practice
    Aznar, Marianne C.
    Petersen, Peter Meidahl
    Logadottir, Ashildur
    Lindberg, Henriette
    Korreman, Stine S.
    Kjaer-Kristoffersen, Flemming
    Engelholm, Svend Aage
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 97 (03) : 480 - 484
  • [3] ASSESSING THE ROLE OF VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY (VMAT) RELATIVE TO IMRT AND HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LOCALIZED, LOCALLY ADVANCED, AND POST-OPERATIVE PROSTATE CANCER
    Davidson, Melanie T. M.
    Blake, Samuel J.
    Batchelar, Deidre L.
    Cheung, Patrick
    Mah, Katherine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (05): : 1550 - 1558
  • [4] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer: Acute toxicity in 114 patients
    De Meerleer, G
    Vakaet, L
    Meersschout, S
    Villeirs, G
    Verbaeys, A
    Oosterlinck, W
    De Neve, W
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (03): : 777 - 787
  • [5] Early prostate cancer: clinical decision-making
    Jani, AB
    Hellman, S
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 361 (9362) : 1045 - 1053
  • [6] Jemal A, 2011, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V61, P133, DOI [10.3322/caac.20105, 10.3322/caac.20073]
  • [7] Daily variations in delivered doses in patients treated with radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer
    Kupelian, Patrick A.
    Langen, Katja M.
    Zeidan, Omar A.
    Meeks, Sanford L.
    Willoughby, Twyla R.
    Wagner, Thomas H.
    Jeswani, Sam
    Ruchala, Kenneth J.
    Haimerl, Jason
    Olivera, Gustavo H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : 876 - 882
  • [8] Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion
    Li, Haisen S.
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    Enke, Charles A.
    Foster, Ryan D.
    Willoughby, Twyla R.
    Kupellian, Patrick A.
    Solberg, Timothy D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (03): : 801 - 812
  • [9] Toxicity after three-dimensional radiotherapy for prostate cancer on RTOG 9406 dose level V
    Michalski, JM
    Winter, K
    Purdy, JA
    Parliament, M
    Wong, H
    Perez, CA
    Roach, M
    Bosch, W
    Cox, JD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (03): : 706 - 713
  • [10] VOLUMETRIC ARC THERAPY AND INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR PRIMARY PROSTATE RADIOTHERAPY WITH SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST TO INTRAPROSTATIC LESION WITH 6 AND 18 MV: A PLANNING COMPARISON STUDY
    Ost, Piet
    Speleers, Bruno
    De Meerleer, Gert
    De Neve, Wilfried
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Villeirs, Geert
    De Gersem, Werner
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (03): : 920 - 926