AGRONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF WATER-TABLE MANAGEMENT

被引:57
作者
MADRAMOOTOO, CA
DODDS, GT
PAPADOPOULOS, A
机构
[1] Agric. Engrg. Dept., Macdonald Campus, McGill Univ., Montreal, QC
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:6(1052)
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The benefits of water-table management for increasing crop yields, and reducing nitrate pollution were assessed for the St. Lawrence lowlands region of eastern Canada. Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. cvs. Apache and KG 30] were grown in 0.4-m I.D. field lysimeters in relatively wet (1990) and dry (1991) years, and subjected to controlled water tables of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 m. The latter was regarded as conventional, free-outlet drainage. Plant parameters, including yield. as well as nitrate, ammonium, and moisture distributions in the soil profile (0.3 m and 0.7 m) were measured. Seed and pod number per plant, and percent nitrogen in the seed were approximately 20% higher for the 0.4-, 0.6-, and 0.8-m water-table treatments. compared to the conventional drainage treatment. No significant differences were observed between the three shallowest water-table depths. Soil nitrate levels were higher in the conventional drainage treatment, compared to the controlled water tables, particularly at the 0.7-m sampling depth. There were no significant differences in nitrate between the three shallower water-table depths. Soil ammonium levels were lowest under conventional drainage and increased throughout the growing season, particularly at the 0.7-m sampling depth. Due to lack of significant differences in yield and soil nitrate for the 0.4-, 0.6-, and 0.8-m water tables, it is recommended that water tables be maintained at 0.6 to 0.8 m. This practice will result in reduced nitrate contamination of water resources and maximum soybean yield.
引用
收藏
页码:1052 / 1065
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BROUGHTON RS, 1972, THESIS MCGILL U MONT
[2]   EFFECT OF WATER-TABLE LEVEL ON THE YIELD OF SOYBEAN GROWN UNDER SUBIRRIGATION DRAINAGE [J].
COOPER, RL ;
FAUSEY, NR ;
STREETER, JG .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1992, 5 (01) :180-184
[3]  
DOSS BD, 1974, AGRON J, V66, P297, DOI 10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600020032x
[4]  
GALLICHAND J, 1991, CAN AGR ENG, V33, P1
[5]   PLANTING DATE, ROW SPACING, AND IRRIGATION EFFECTS ON SOYBEAN GROWN ON CLAY SOIL [J].
HEATHERLY, LG .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1988, 80 (02) :227-231
[6]   RESPONSE OF 9 SOYBEAN LINES TO SOIL-MOISTURE CONDITIONS CLOSE TO SATURATION [J].
HUNTER, MN ;
JABRUN, PLMD ;
BYTH, DE .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1980, 20 (104) :339-345
[7]  
Jutras P, 1967, CANADIAN AGR ENG, V9, P117
[8]  
Keeney D. R., 1982, Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, P643
[9]  
KORTE LL, 1983, CROP SCI, V23, P521, DOI 10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300030020x
[10]  
MADRAMOOTOO CA, 1991, CSAE91108 PAP