Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)

被引:260
|
作者
Andersson, Hans Christer [1 ]
Arpaia, Salvatore [1 ]
Bartsch, Detlef [1 ]
Casacuberta, Josep [1 ]
Davies, Howard [1 ]
du Jardin, Patrick [1 ]
Flachowsky, Gerhard [1 ]
Herman, Lieve [1 ]
Jones, Huw [1 ]
Karenlampi, Sirpa [1 ]
Kiss, Jozsef [1 ]
Kleter, Gijs [1 ]
Kuiper, Harry [1 ]
Messean, Antoine [1 ]
Nielsen, Kaare Magne [1 ]
Perry, Joe [1 ]
Poting, Annette [1 ]
Sweet, Jeremy [1 ]
Tebbe, Christoph [1 ]
von Wright, Atte Johannes [1 ]
Wal, Jean-Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
GMOs; GM plants; GM food; GM feed; guidance; applications; Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003; food safety; feed safety; risk assessment; comparative approach; stacked events; comparator; conventional counterpart;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2150
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This document provides updated guidance for the risk assessment of food and feed containing, consisting or produced from genetically modified (GM) plants, submitted within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on GM food and feed. The risk assessment strategy for GM plants and derived food and feed proposed seeks to deploy appropriate approaches to compare GM plants and derived food and feed with their respective comparators. The underlying assumption of this comparative approach is that traditionally cultivated crops have gained a history of safe use for consumers and/or domesticated animals. The document provides guidance on how to perform the comparative analysis of the relevant characteristics of the GM plant. The document addresses the details of the different components of the risk assessment: the molecular characterisation, which provides information on the structure and expression of the insert(s) and on the stability of the intended trait(s); the toxicological assessment, which addresses the impact of biologically relevant change(s) in the GM plant and/or derived food and feed resulting from the genetic modification; the assessment of potential allergenicity, of the novel protein(s) as well as of the whole food derived from the GM plant; the nutritional assessment to evaluate whether food and feed derived from a GM plant is not nutritionally disadvantageous to humans and/or animals. In addition every section of the document addresses specifically the requirements for GM plants containing a combination of transformation events, providing guidance on how to establish that the combination is stable and that no interactions occurs between the events that may raise safety concerns. The document does not cover the environmental risk assessment of GM plants which is addressed in a stand-alone environmental risk assessment (ERA) guidance document developed by the EFSA GMO Panel.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Guidance on selection of comparators for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
    Andersson, Hans Christer
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Casacuberta, Josep
    Davies, Howard
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Herman, Lieve
    Jones, Huw
    Karenlampi, Sirpa
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Kuiper, Harry
    Messean, Antoine
    Nielsen, Kaare Magne
    Perry, Joe
    Poting, Annette
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Tebbe, Christoph
    von Wright, Atte Johannes
    Wal, Jean-Michel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (05)
  • [2] Guidance on the risk assessment of genetically modified microorganisms and their products intended for food and feed use EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
    Andersson, Hans Christer
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Casacuberta, Josep
    Davies, Howard
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Herman, Lieve
    Jones, Huw
    Kaerenlampi, Sirpa
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Kuiper, Harry
    Messean, Antoine
    Nielsen, Kaare Magne
    Perry, Joe
    Poeting, Annette
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Tebbe, Christoph
    von Wright, Atte Johannes
    Wal, Jean-Michel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (06)
  • [5] Scientific Opinion on Guidance for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants used for non-food or non-feed purposes EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) (2, 3, 4)
    Andersson, Hans Christer
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Casacuberta, Josep
    Davies, Howard
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Hendriksen, Niels
    Herman, Lieve
    Kaerenlampi, Sirpa
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Kryspin-Sorensen, Ilona
    Kuiper, Harry
    Nes, Ingolf
    Panopoulos, Nickolas
    Perry, Joe
    Poeting, Annette
    Schiemann, Joachim
    Seinen, Willem
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Wal, Jean-Michel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (08)
  • [6] Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel)
    Andersson, Hans Christer
    Arpaia, Salvatore
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Casacuberta, Josep
    Davies, Howard
    du Jardin, Patrick
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Herman, Lieve
    Jones, Huw
    Karenlampi, Sirpa
    Kiss, Jozsef
    Kleter, Gijs
    Kuiper, Harry
    Messean, Antoine
    Nielsen, Kaare Magne
    Perry, Joe
    Poeting, Annette
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Tebbe, Christoph
    von Wright, Atte Johannes
    Wal, Jean-Michel
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (07)
  • [8] Outcome of the public consultation on the draft Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) on the guidance document on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants
    Bartsch, Detlef
    Chueca, Cristina
    De Schrijver, Adinda
    Gathmann, Achim
    Hails, Rosie
    Messean, Antoine
    Perry, Joe
    Roda, Lucia
    Sessitsch, Angela
    Squire, Geoff
    Sweet, Jeremy
    Lheureux, Karine
    Mestdagh, Sylvie
    Devos, Yann
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (11)
  • [10] Efsa proposed guidance document for the risk assessment of genetically modified food and feed open for consultation
    不详
    AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH, 2004, 15 (02): : 8 - 8