Assessing the Incremental Value of Blood Oxygen Saturation (SpO(2)) in the miniPIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) Risk Prediction Model

被引:29
作者
Payne, Beth A. [1 ,2 ]
Hutcheon, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Dunsmuir, Dustin [2 ,3 ]
Cloete, Garth [4 ]
Dumont, Guy [2 ,5 ]
Hall, David [6 ]
Lim, Joanne [2 ,3 ]
Magee, Laura A. [2 ,7 ]
Sikandar, Rozina [8 ]
Qureshi, Rahat [8 ]
van Papendorp, Erika [6 ]
Ansermino, J. Mark [2 ,3 ]
von Dadelszen, Peter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Child & Family Res Inst, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Anesthesiol Pharmacol & Therapeut, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Engn, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[7] Univ British Columbia, Dept Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[8] Aga Khan Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Karachi, Pakistan
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Preeclampsia; prognosis; recalibration; pulse oximetry;
D O I
10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30358-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the incremental value of blood oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) as a predictor in the miniPIERS model, a risk prediction model for adverse outcomes among women with a diagnosis of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) in low-resourced settings. Methods: Using data from a prospective cohort including 852 women admitted to hospital for a HDP, the association between SpO(2) and adverse maternal outcome was assessed using logistic regression. The miniPIERS model was recalibrated and extended to include SpO(2). The incremental value of adding SpO(2) to the model was measured using a net reclassification index (NRI), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios. Results: SpO(2) of < 93% was associated with a 30-fold increase in risk (95% CI 14 to 68) of adverse maternal outcome compared to women with SpO(2) > 97%. After recalibration and extension, the miniPIERS model including SpO(2) (vs. not including SpO(2)) had improved sensitivity (32.8% vs. 49.6%) at the cost of minimally decreased specificity (91.5% vs. 96.2%) with a NRI of 0.122. Conclusion: SpO(2) is a significant independent predictor of risk in women with a HDP. Adding SpO(2) to the miniPIERS model improved the model's ability to correctly identify high-risk patients who would benefit most from interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 24
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] A Risk Prediction Model for the Assessment and Triage of Women with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Low-Resourced Settings: The miniPIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) Multi-country Prospective Cohort Study
    Payne, Beth A.
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Ansermino, J. Mark
    Hall, David R.
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Bhutta, Shereen Z.
    Biryabarema, Christine
    Grobman, William A.
    Groen, Henk
    Haniff, Farizah
    Li, Jing
    Magee, Laura A.
    Merialdi, Mario
    Nakimuli, Annettee
    Qu, Ziguang
    Sikandar, Rozina
    Sass, Nelson
    Sawchuck, Diane
    Steyn, D. Wilhelm
    Widmer, Mariana
    Zhou, Jian
    von Dadelszen, Peter
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (01)
  • [12] Interpreting Incremental Value of Markers Added to Risk Prediction Models
    Pencina, Michael J.
    D'Agostino, Ralph B.
    Pencina, Karol M.
    Janssens, A. Cecile J. W.
    Greenland, Philip
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 176 (06) : 473 - 481
  • [13] Statistical methods for assessment of added usefulness of new biomarkers
    Pencina, Michael J.
    D'Agostino, Ralph B.
    Vasan, Ramachandran S.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 48 (12) : 1703 - 1711
  • [14] Pre-eclampsia
    Steegers, Eric A. P.
    von Dadelszen, Peter
    Duvekot, Johannes J.
    Pijnenborg, Robert
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 376 (9741) : 631 - 644
  • [15] Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage
    Steyerberg, EW
    Borsboom, GJJM
    van Houwelingen, HC
    Eijkemans, MJC
    Habbema, JDF
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (16) : 2567 - 2586
  • [16] Internal and external validation of predictive models: A simulation study of bias and precision in small samples
    Steyerberg, EW
    Bleeker, SE
    Moll, HA
    Grobbee, DE
    Moons, KGM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (05) : 441 - 447
  • [17] Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Cook, Nancy R.
    Gerds, Thomas
    Gonen, Mithat
    Obuchowski, Nancy
    Pencina, Michael J.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) : 128 - 138
  • [18] Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: A review
    Toll, D. B.
    Janssen, K. J. M.
    Vergouwe, Y.
    Moons, K. G. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (11) : 1085 - 1094
  • [19] Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model
    von Dadelszen, Peter
    Payne, Beth
    Li, Jing
    Ansermino, J. Mark
    Pipkin, Fiona Broughton
    Cote, Anne-Marie
    Douglas, M. Joanne
    Gruslin, Andree
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Joseph, K. S.
    Kyle, Phillipa M.
    Lee, Tang
    Loughna, Pamela
    Menzies, Jennifer M.
    Merialdi, Mario
    Millman, Alexandra L.
    Moore, M. Peter
    Moutquin, Jean-Marie
    Ouellet, Annie B.
    Smith, Graeme N.
    Walker, James J.
    Walley, Keith R.
    Walters, Barry N.
    Widmer, Mariana
    Lee, Shoo K.
    Russell, James A.
    Magee, Laura A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 377 (9761) : 219 - 227
  • [20] WHO, 2011, WHO REC PREV TREATM