Imaging Modalities in the Outcome Assessment of Knee Osteoarthritis

被引:0
作者
Teichtahl, Andrew J. [1 ]
Cicuttini, Flavia M. [1 ]
Wluka, Anita E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Baker Heart Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); knee; cartilage; radiological; osteoarthritis;
D O I
10.2174/157339706776876125
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Knee radiography is the current "gold standard" for assessing the severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in clinical and research settings. Nevertheless, radiographic evaluation of OA is an insensitive and unreliable measure for quantifying disease severity and change over relatively short periods of time. The failure of knee radiographs to provide a sensitive outcome measure may be one factor that has contributed to the limited progress that has been achieved in developing effective treatments to slow or stop the progression of knee OA. Emerging evidence suggests that measurement of articular cartilage volume using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is valid, reproducible and sensitive to change in both normal subjects and those with OA. This review discusses the issues related to joint imaging using radiographs and MRI in the outcome assessment of knee OA.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 136
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Contribution of meniscal extrusion and cartilage loss to joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis
    Adams, JG
    McAlindon, T
    Dimasi, M
    Carey, J
    Eustace, S
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 54 (08) : 502 - 506
  • [2] Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society - Results from a workshop
    Altman, R
    Brandt, K
    Hochberg, M
    MOskowitz, R
    Bellamy, N
    Bloch, DA
    Buckwalter, J
    Dougados, M
    Ehrlich, G
    Lequesne, M
    Lohmander, S
    Murphy, WA
    RosarioJansen, T
    Schwartz, B
    Trippel, S
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1996, 4 (04) : 217 - 243
  • [3] Risk factors for progressive cartilage loss in the knee
    Biswal, S
    Hastie, T
    Andriacchi, TP
    Bergman, GA
    Dillingham, MF
    Lang, P
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (11): : 2884 - 2892
  • [4] Buckland-Wright JC, 1999, J RHEUMATOL, V26, P2664
  • [5] ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF JOINT SPACE WIDTH MEASUREMENTS IN STANDARD AND MACRORADIOGRAPHS OF OSTEOARTHRITIC KNEES
    BUCKLANDWRIGHT, JC
    MACFARLANE, DG
    WILLIAMS, SA
    WARD, RJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1995, 54 (11) : 872 - 880
  • [6] Burgkart R, 2001, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V44, P2072, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2072::AID-ART357>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-3
  • [8] Burnett SJ., 1994, RADIOGRAPHIC ATLAS O
  • [9] Comparison of tibial cartilage volume and radiologic grade of the tibiofemoral joint
    Cicuttini, FM
    Wluka, A
    Forbes, A
    Wolfe, R
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2003, 48 (03): : 682 - 688
  • [10] Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume
    Cicuttini, FM
    Forbes, A
    Asbeutah, A
    Morris, K
    Stuckey, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2000, 18 (04) : 580 - 584