SELFHOOD AND IDENTITY IN CONFUCIANISM, TAOISM, BUDDHISM, AND HINDUISM - CONTRASTS WITH THE WEST

被引:182
作者
HO, DYF
机构
[1] Department of Psychology Hong Kong, University of Hong Kong
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-5914.1995.tb00269.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article explores conceptions of selfhood and identity originating from four intellectual traditions: the relational self in Confucianism, selflessness in Taoism, self-renunciation in Buddhism, and Atman-Brahman identity in Hinduism. It compares these conceptions with one another and with the core of Western conceptions pertaining to: (a) subject-object distinction, (b) self-other demarcation and individual identity, and (c) the centrality and sovereignty of the self. Psychological decentering is identified as a unifying theme underlying Eastern conceptions of selfhood. A beginning step toward the reconstruction of the self informed by the four traditions promises to enlarge our horizons about the self and its place in society, nature, and the cosmos.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 139
页数:25
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Brentano F, 2014, PSYCHOL EMPIRICAL ST
[2]  
Chan Wing-Tsit, 1963, SOURCE BOOK CHINESE
[3]  
CROOK J, 1988, ASIAN CONTRIBUTIONS, P149
[4]  
De Bary William Theodore, 1960, SOURCES CHINESE TRAD, V1-2
[5]  
DeVos G., 1985, CULTURE SELF ASIAN W, P141, DOI DOI 10.1525/AE.1986.13.4.02A00180
[6]  
FREUD S, 1959, BEYOND PLEASURE PRIN
[7]  
GRAHAM AC, 1989, DISPUTES TAO PHILOS
[8]   THE TOTALITARIAN EGO - FABRICATION AND REVISION OF PERSONAL HISTORY [J].
GREENWALD, AG .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 35 (07) :603-618
[9]  
HAAS WS, 1956, DESTINY MIND
[10]  
Ho D., 1993, INDIGENOUS PSYCHOL R, V17, P240