Evaluation of intraoral complications of buccal mucosa graft in augmentation urethroplasty

被引:8
作者
Akyuz, Mehmet [1 ]
Gunes, Mustafa [2 ]
Koca, Orhan [1 ]
Sertkaya, Zulfu [1 ]
Kanberoglu, Huseyin [1 ]
Karaman, Muhammet Ihsan [1 ]
机构
[1] Haydarpasa Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Isparta, Turkey
来源
TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2014年 / 40卷 / 03期
关键词
Augmentation urethroplasty; buccal graft complications; urethral stricture;
D O I
10.5152/tud.2014.46343
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate intraoral complications of buccal mucosa grafts harvested from one cheek, and used in augmentation urethroplasty. Material and methods: Twenty-one patients with anterior urethral strictures were included in our study. In twelve patients, dorsal onlay, in five patients ventral onlay and in four patients lateral onlay procedures were applied. Average length of buccal mucosa graft from one cheek was 5.2 cm (3-8 cm). In all graft harvesting patients, bleeding in graft side, swelling, pain intensity of oral or perineal area, analgesic use, transition time to normal diet, slurred speech, loss of sensation, and patients' opinions about oral mucosa regrafting using this technique were evaluated using nine-item questionnaire forms. Results: Eighteen (85.7%) of our patients had mild pain, 13 (61.9%) had mild intraoral swelling, none of our patients had oral bleeding that needed extra procedure and all of our patients were observed to start off their normal diet in the first 3 days. Twelve (57.1%) of our patients needed analgesic agents after the operation while 14 (66.7%) of them have remarked that perineal incision was more painful. Twenty (95.3%) of our patients stated that they could go under the same procedure again. None of our patients had speech disorders or intraoral numbness. Conclusion: Even though buccal mucosal grafting used in augmentation urethroplasty is not a completely painless procedure, buccal mucosa graft is an ideal source of allograft in terms of safe and easy obtainance and improved patient tolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 160
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   What is the Best Technique for Urethroplasty? [J].
Andrich, Daniela E. ;
Mundy, Anthony R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (05) :1031-1041
[2]  
Barbagli Guido, 2007, Int. braz j urol., V33, P461
[3]   Morbidity of Oral Mucosa Graft Harvesting from a Single Cheek [J].
Barbagli, Guido ;
Vallasciani, Santiago ;
Romano, Giuseppe ;
Fabbri, Fabio ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Lazzeri, Massimo .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (01) :33-41
[4]   Comparison of uni-and bilateral buccal mucosa harvesting in terms of oral morbidity [J].
Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil ;
Yalcinkaya, Fatih ;
Sertcelik, Memduh Nurettin ;
Zengin, Kursad .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 39 (01) :43-47
[5]   Donor Site Outcome After Oral Mucosa Harvest for Urethroplasty in Children and Adults [J].
Castagnetti, Marco ;
Ghirardo, Vittorina ;
Capizzi, Alfio ;
Andretta, Marilisa ;
Rigamonti, Waifro .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (06) :2624-2628
[6]   AUTOLOGOUS BUCCAL MUCOSA GRAFT FOR HYPOSPADIAS REPAIR - AN INITIAL REPORT [J].
DESSANTI, A ;
RIGAMONTI, W ;
MERULLA, V ;
FALCHETTI, D ;
CACCIA, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (04) :1081-1084
[7]   Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty [J].
Dublin, N ;
Stewart, LH .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (06) :867-869
[8]   A one-stage operation for hypospadias [J].
Humby, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1941, 29 (113) :84-92
[9]   Donor-site morbidity in buccal mucosa urethroplasty:: lower lip or inner cheek? [J].
Kamp, S ;
Knoll, T ;
Osman, M ;
Häcker, A ;
Michel, MS ;
Alken, P .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (04) :619-623
[10]   Review and treatment algorithm of open surgical techniques for management of urethral strictures [J].
MacDonald, MF ;
Santucci, RA .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (01) :9-15