Relevance of Health Technology Assessment for Benefit Decisions in Germany Now and in the Future

被引:3
作者
Busse, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, SeKr EB2 Str 17 Juni 145, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
来源
GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT | 2005年 / 10卷
关键词
Health Technology Assessment; evaluation; statutory health insurance; benefit basket;
D O I
10.1055/s-2005-858416
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In Germany, health technology assessment (HTA) was discovered in 1995 when the Federal Ministry of Health commissioned a state-of-the- art review. In 2000, the German Agency for HTA was founded with the objective to develop a HTA information system. Since 2004, the new Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care has even broader tasks. Between 1991 and 2003, the Federal Committee of Physicians and Sickness Funds made 50 decisions regarding the inclusion of technologies in the benefit catalogue for ambulatory care. Before 1997, HTA played a negligible role but then its role increased. Costs were considered explicitly only twice. Pharmaceuticals were not assessed. The committee's successor, the Federal Joint Committee, still uses three different evaluation procedures for ambulatory care, dental care and inpatient care respectively. Evidence is mainly based on studies, ranked according to criteria of evidence-based medicine. In future, HTA needs to become more rigid, more flexible and more innovative. The acceptance of the necessity of assessments has to growamong decision-makers as new technologies still get unevaluated into the benefit catalogue, and the evaluation procedures need to be standardised. The reliance on study designs needs to be lessened, e.g. to include the quality of study execution, the number of studies, their consistency and effect size into account. Besides Yes/No-decisions, intermediate categories are necessary, e.g. the limitation of technologies to particular centres or the inclusion of all patients into registers. Besides evaluating effectiveness, attention needs to be given to social, ethical, organisational and economic implications of a technology.
引用
收藏
页码:S52 / S58
页数:7
相关论文
共 3 条
[1]   Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services -: Methods [J].
Briss, PA ;
Zaza, S ;
Pappaioanou, M ;
Fielding, J ;
Wright-De Agüero, L ;
Truman, BI ;
Hopkins, DP ;
Mullen, PD ;
Thompson, RS ;
Woolf, SH ;
Carande-Kulis, VG ;
Anderson, L ;
Hinman, AR ;
McQueen, DV ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Harris, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (01) :35-43
[2]   Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments -: Working group 4 report [J].
Busse, R ;
Orvain, J ;
Velasco, M ;
Perleth, M ;
Drummond, M ;
Gürtner, F ;
Jorgensen, T ;
Jovell, A ;
Malone, J ;
Rüther, A ;
Wild, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 18 (02) :361-422
[3]  
Worz M, INNOVATIVE MEDIZINPR