A COMPARISON OF 2 PHOTOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS FOR GRADING CATARACT

被引:0
|
作者
TAYLOR, HR
LEE, JA
WANG, F
MUNOZ, B
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,DANA CTR PREVENT OPHTHALMOL,BALTIMORE,MD 21218
[2] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,WILMER INST,BALTIMORE,MD 21218
关键词
CATARACT GRADING; LENS OPACITIES; CORTICAL OPACITIES; NUCLEAR OPACITIES; POSTERIOR SUBCAPSULAR OPACITIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Two different systems for classifying lens opacities were compared: the Lens Opacity Classification System version II (LOCS II) and the system developed at Johns Hopkins University. Using the two systems, slit-lamp photographs of the nucleus and retroillumination lens photographs of 100 eyes were graded. Each photographs was graded independently by three trained observers, and the time taken to grade the photographs was similar. Each system uses photographs to define the severity of nuclear opacity and nuclear color, and each showed good interobserver agreement (kappa statistic, > 0.6). The method of classifying cortical and posterior subcapsular opacity varied, and although interobserver agreement was acceptable in each system, it was somewhat higher with the Hopkins system. Because different standards and definitions are used to define severity with each system, there was some variation in the classification of individual photographs and corresponding differences in the proportion of photographs in each grade of severity. These data provide a useful cross reference for future comparison of studies using these systems.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 532
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ACNE GRADING METHOD USING PHOTOGRAPHIC STANDARDS
    COOK, CH
    CENTNER, RL
    MICHAELS, SE
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1979, 115 (05) : 571 - 575
  • [32] Comparison study of two diagnostic and grading systems for conjunctivochalasis
    Zhang Xing-ru
    Zou Hai-dong
    Li Qing-song
    Zhou Huan-ming
    Liu Bin
    Han Zhu-mei
    Xiang Min-hong
    Zhang Zheng-yong
    Wang Han-min
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (16) : 3118 - 3123
  • [33] GOSEKI GRADING IN GASTRIC-CANCER - COMPARISON WITH EXISTING SYSTEMS OF GRADING AND ITS REPRODUCIBILITY
    DIXON, MF
    MARTIN, IG
    SUELING, HM
    WYATT, JI
    QUIRKE, P
    JOHNSTON, D
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 25 (04) : 309 - 316
  • [34] A comparison of three histological grading systems in endometrial cancer
    Bilgin T.
    Özuysal S.
    Ozan H.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2005, 272 (1) : 23 - 25
  • [35] Comparison study of two diagnostic and grading systems for conjunctivochalasis
    ZHANG Xing-ru
    ZOU Hai-dong
    LI Qing-song
    ZHOU Huan-ming
    LIU Bin
    HAN Zhu-mei
    XIANG Min-hong
    ZHANG Zheng-yong
    WANG Han-min
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2013, (16) : 3118 - 3123
  • [36] Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems
    Balaban, B
    Yakin, K
    Urman, B
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 85 (03) : 559 - 563
  • [37] OUTCOMES OF ANTENATAL HYDRONEPHROSIS AND COMPARISON OF HYDRONEPHROSIS GRADING SYSTEMS
    Sandal, Bilge
    GOknar, NilUfer
    Turhan, Pinar
    KeleSoGlu, Emre
    UCkardeS, Diana
    Candan, Cengiz
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 37 (11) : 2917 - 2917
  • [38] A comparison of two grading systems for filtering blebs.
    Marks, JR
    Siriwardena, D
    Wells, A
    Frangouli, A
    Khaw, PT
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S581 - S581
  • [39] Histologic grading of salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A comparison of four grading systems and correlation with survival
    Sood, Neelam
    Meena, Swati
    Gupta, Ruchika
    Gupta, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 20 (01) : 57 - 61
  • [40] THE OXFORD CLINICAL CATARACT CLASSIFICATION AND GRADING SYSTEM
    SPARROW, JM
    BRON, AJ
    BROWN, NAP
    AYLIFFE, W
    HILL, AR
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1986, 9 (04) : 207 - 225