Patient participation in cancer clinical trials: A pilot test of lay navigation

被引:21
作者
Cartmell, Kathleen B. [1 ,2 ]
Bonilha, Heather S. [3 ]
Matson, Terri [1 ]
Bryant, Debbie C. [1 ,2 ]
Zapka, Jane [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Bentz, Tricia A. [1 ]
Ford, Marvella E. [1 ,4 ]
Hughes-Halbert, Chanita [1 ]
Simpson, Kit N. [3 ,5 ]
Alberg, Anthony J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Hollings Canc Ctr, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Coll Nursing, 99 Jonathan Lucas St,MSC 160, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Coll Hlth Profess, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
来源
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS | 2016年 / 3卷
关键词
Clinical trial enrollment; Clinical trial education; Clinical trial understanding; Barriers to care; Patient navigation; Health disparities;
D O I
10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.005
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Clinical trials (CT) represent an important treatment option for cancer patients. Unfortunately, patients face challenges to enrolling in CTs, such as logistical barriers, poor CT understanding and complex clinical regimens. Patient navigation is a strategy that may help to improve the delivery of CT education and support services. We examined the feasibility and initial effect of one navigation strategy, use of lay navigators. Methods: A lay CT navigation intervention was evaluated in a prospective cohort study among 40 lung and esophageal cancer patients. The intervention was delivered by a trained lay navigator who viewed a 17-min CT educational video with each patient, assessed and answered their questions about CT participation and addressed reported barriers to care and trial participation. Results: During this 12-month pilot project, 85% (95% CI: 72%-93%) of patients eligible for a therapeutic CT consented to participate in the CT navigation intervention. Among navigated patients, CT understanding improved between pre-and post-test (means 3.54 and 4.40, respectively; p-value 0.004), and 95% (95% CI: 82%-98%) of navigated patients consented to participate in a CT. Navigated patients reported being satisfied with patient navigation services and CT participation. Conclusions: In this formative single-arm pilot project, initial evidence was found for the potential effect of a lay navigation intervention on CT understanding and enrollment. A randomized controlled trial is needed to examine the efficacy of the intervention for improving CT education and enrollment. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 93
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials
    Aaronson, NK
    VisserPol, E
    Leenhouts, GHMW
    Muller, MJ
    vanderSchot, ACM
    vanDam, FSAM
    Keus, RB
    Koning, CCE
    Huinink, WWT
    vanDongen, JA
    Dubbelman, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (03) : 984 - 996
  • [2] American Cancer Society, 2015, CANC FACTS FIG 2015
  • [3] Banda DR, 2012, ONCOLOGIST, V17, P708, DOI [10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0454, 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0454]
  • [4] Bryant Debbie Chatman, 2011, J Natl Black Nurses Assoc, V22, P68
  • [5] Physician-Related Factors Involved in Patient Decisions to Enroll Onto Cancer Clinical Trials
    Comis, Robert L.
    Miller, Jon D.
    Colaizzi, Diane D.
    Kimmel, Linda G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2009, 5 (02) : 50 - 56
  • [6] Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-to-read informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: A study of the eastern cooperative oncology group
    Coyne, CA
    Xu, RH
    Raich, P
    Plomer, K
    Dignan, M
    Wenzel, LB
    Fairclough, D
    Habermann, T
    Schnell, L
    Quella, S
    Cella, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) : 836 - 842
  • [7] The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: Summary and Recommendations
    Denicoff, Andrea M.
    McCaskill-Stevens, Worta
    Grubbs, Stephen S.
    Bruinooge, Suanna S.
    Comis, Robert L.
    Devine, Peggy
    Dilts, David M.
    Duff, Michelle E.
    Ford, Jean G.
    Joffe, Steven
    Schapira, Lidia
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    Michaels, Margo
    Raghavan, Derek
    Richmond, Ellen S.
    Zon, Robin
    Albrecht, Terrance L.
    Bookman, Michael A.
    Dowlati, Afshin
    Enos, Rebecca A.
    Fouad, Mona N.
    Good, Marjorie
    Hicks, William J.
    Loehrer, Patrick J., Sr.
    Lyss, Alan P.
    Wolff, Steven N.
    Wujcik, Debra M.
    Meropol, Neal J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2013, 9 (06) : 267 - 276
  • [8] Predictors of enrollment in lung cancer clinical trials
    Du, W
    Gadgeel, SM
    Simon, MS
    [J]. CANCER, 2006, 106 (02) : 420 - 425
  • [9] Education Network to Advance Cancer Clinical Trials (ENAACT) Foundation, 2011, 5 STEPS ENH PAT PART
  • [10] Informing breast cancer patients about clinical trials: a randomized clinical trial of an educational booklet
    Ellis, PM
    Butow, PN
    Tattersall, MHN
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (09) : 1414 - 1423