TRANSEPITHELIAL POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE IN TOAD URINARY-BLADDER IS NOT DUE TO IONIC-DIFFUSION

被引:32
作者
FINN, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV N CAROLINA,SCH MED,DEPT MED,CHAPEL HILL,NC 27514
关键词
D O I
10.1038/250495a0
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 496
页数:2
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
FRAZIER HOWARD S., 1963, JOUR GEN PHYSIOL, V46, P491, DOI 10.1085/jgp.46.3.491
[2]   EFFECT OF MUCOSAL AND SEROSAL SOLUTION CATIONS ON BIOELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF ISOLATED TOAD BLADDER [J].
GATZY, JT ;
CLARKSON, TW .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1965, 48 (04) :647-&
[3]   THE NATURE OF THE FROG SKIN POTENTIAL [J].
KOEFOEDJOHNSEN, V ;
USSING, HH .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1958, 42 (3-4) :298-308
[4]   EFFECTS OF ALKALI METAL CATIONS ON POTENTIAL ACROSS TOAD AND BULLFROG URINARY BLADDER [J].
LEB, DE ;
HOSHIKO, T ;
LINDLEY, BD ;
DUGAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1965, 48 (03) :527-&
[5]  
POURHASS.H, 1974, FED PROC, V33, P216
[6]   CONTRALATERAL EFFECTS OF SODIUM AND POTASSIUM ON ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL IN FROG SKIN AND TOAD BLADDER [J].
SNELL, FM ;
CHOWDHURY, TK .
NATURE, 1965, 207 (4992) :45-+