Feature map size selection for fMRI classification on end-to-end deep convolutional neural networks

被引:2
作者
Suhaimi, Farahana [1 ]
Htike, Zaw Zaw [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Islamic Univ Malaysia, Fac Engn, Gombak, Malaysia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES | 2018年 / 5卷 / 08期
关键词
Classification; Functional MRI; Deep learning; CNN; Feature map;
D O I
10.21833/ijaas.2018.08.012
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The emergence of convolutional neural networks (CNN) in various fields has also paved numerous ways for advancement in the field of medical imaging. This paper focuses on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in the field of neuroimaging. It has high temporal resolution and robust to control or non-control subjects. CNN analysis on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fMRI datasets is compared to rule out one of the grey areas in building CNNs for medical imaging analysis. This study focuses on the feature map size selection on fMRI datasets with CNNs where the selected sizes are evaluated for their performances. Although few outstanding studies on fMRI have been published, the availability of diverse previous studies on MRI previous works impulses us to study to learn the pattern of feature map sizes for CNN configuration. Six configurations are analyzed with prominent public fMRI dataset, names as Human Connectome Project (HCP). This dataset is widely used for any type of fMRI classification. With three set of data divisions, the accuracy values for validation set of fMRI classification are assessed and discussed. Despite the fact that only one slice of every 118 subjects' temporal brain images is used in the study, the validation of classification for three training-excluded subjects known as validation set, has proven the need for feature map size selection. This paper emphasizes the indispensable step of selecting the feature map sizes when designing CNN for fMRI classification. In addition, we provide proofs that validation set should consist of distinct subjects for definite evaluation of any model performance. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by IASE.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 103
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Aarti Bagul, 2017, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1711.05225
  • [2] Andrew Zisserman, 2015, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1409.1556
  • [3] Bengio Yoshua, 2013, Statistical Language and Speech Processing. First International Conference, SLSP 2013. Proceedings: LNCS 7978, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-39593-2_1
  • [4] Computational approaches to fMRI analysis
    Cohen, Jonathan D.
    Daw, Nathaniel
    Engelhardt, Barbara
    Hasson, Uri
    Li, Kai
    Niv, Yael
    Norman, Kenneth A.
    Pillow, Jonathan
    Ramadge, Peter J.
    Turk-Browne, Nicholas B.
    Willke, Theodore L.
    [J]. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 20 (03) : 304 - 313
  • [5] Cui ZP, 2016, CHIN CONTR CONF, P7026, DOI 10.1109/ChiCC.2016.7554465
  • [6] Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates
    Eklund, Anders
    Nichols, Thomas E.
    Knutsson, Hans
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (28) : 7900 - 7905
  • [7] Gehring J, 2017, PR MACH LEARN RES, V70
  • [8] Gollapudi S., 2016, PRACTICAL MACHINE LE
  • [9] Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Overview and Future Promise of an Exciting New Technique
    Greenspan, Hayit
    van Ginneken, Bram
    Summers, Ronald M.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 35 (05) : 1153 - 1159
  • [10] Deep learning for visual understanding: A review
    Guo, Yanming
    Liu, Yu
    Oerlemans, Ard
    Lao, Songyang
    Wu, Song
    Lew, Michael S.
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2016, 187 : 27 - 48