Assessing Instructional Modalities: Individualized Treatment Effects for Personalized Learning

被引:9
作者
Beemer, Joshua [1 ]
Spoon, Kelly [1 ]
Fan, Juanjuan [2 ]
Stronach, Jeanne [3 ]
Frazee, James P. [4 ]
Bohonak, Andrew J. [5 ]
Levine, Richard A. [2 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Computat Sci Res Ctr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[3] San Diego State Univ, Analyt Studies & Inst Res, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[4] San Diego State Univ, Instruct Technol Serv, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[5] San Diego State Univ, Dept Biol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF STATISTICS EDUCATION | 2018年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Educational data mining; Lasso; Learning analytics; Persistence; Random forest; Traditional lecture classroom;
D O I
10.1080/10691898.2018.1426400
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Estimating the efficacy of different instructional modalities, techniques, and interventions is challenging because teaching style covaries with instructor, and the typical student only takes a course once. We introduce the individualized treatment effect (ITE) from analyses of personalized medicine as a means to quantify individual student performance under different instructional modalities or intervention strategies, despite the fact that each student may experience only one "treatment." The ITE is presented within an ensemble machine learning approach to evaluate student performance, identify factors indicative of student success, and estimate persistence. A key element is the use of a priori student information from institutional records. The methods are motivated and illustrated by a comparison of online and standard face-to-face offerings of an upper division applied statistics course that is a curriculum bottleneck at San Diego State University. The ITE allows us to characterize students that benefit from either the online or the traditional offerings. We find that students in the online class performed at least as well as the traditional lecture class on a common final exam. We discuss the general implications of this analytics framework for assessing pedagogical innovations and intervention strategies, identifying and characterizing at-risk students, and optimizing the individualized student learning environment.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Alpaydin E., 2009, INTRO MACHINE LEARNI
[2]  
[Anonymous], R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]  
California State University, 2013, 2014 2015 SUPP BUDG
[4]  
Cruise R.J., 1985, AM STAT ASS P SECTIO, VVolume 4, P92
[5]   A comparison of classroom and online asynchronous problem-based learning for students undertaking statistics training as part of a Public Health Masters degree [J].
de Jong, N. ;
Verstegen, D. M. L. ;
Tan, F. E. S. ;
O'Connor, S. J. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 18 (02) :245-264
[6]  
del Mas R, 2007, STAT ED RES J, V6, P28
[7]   Anxiety and Attitude of Graduate Students in On-Campus vs. Online Statistics Courses [J].
DeVaney, Thomas A. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICS EDUCATION, 2010, 18 (01) :1-15
[8]   Estimating treatment effects for individual patients based on the results of randomised clinical trials [J].
Dorresteijn, Johannes A. N. ;
Visseren, Frank L. J. ;
Ridker, Paul M. ;
Wassink, Annemarie M. J. ;
Paynter, Nina P. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
van der Graaf, Yolanda ;
Cook, Nancy R. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[9]  
Gibbs A. L., 2014, P 9 INT C TEACH STAT
[10]   A Comparison of Student Attitudes, Statistical Reasoning, Performance, and Perceptions for Web-augmented Traditional, Fully Online, and Flipped Sections of a Statistical Literacy Class [J].
Gundlach, Ellen ;
Richards, K. Andrew R. ;
Nelson, David ;
Levesque-Bristol, Chantal .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICS EDUCATION, 2015, 23 (01)