CONTRALATERAL STENOSIS AND STUMP PRESSURES - PARAMETERS TO IDENTIFY THE HIGH-RISK PATIENT UNDERGOING CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY UNDER LOCAL-ANESTHESIA

被引:10
作者
BURKE, PE [1 ]
PRENDIVILLE, E [1 ]
TADROS, E [1 ]
COLGAN, MP [1 ]
MOORE, DJ [1 ]
SHANIK, DG [1 ]
机构
[1] ST JAMES HOSP,DEPT VASC SURG,JAMES ST,POB 580,DUBLIN 8,IRELAND
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY | 1993年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY; HIGH RISK; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; STUMP PRESSURE; CONTRALATERAL STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80015-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under local anaesthesia (LA) enables the assessment of the two parameters of stump pressure and contralateral stenosis as predictors of neurological complications both intra- and postoperatively. Over a 7 year period, 175 carotid endarterectomies were performed under LA and of these, stump pressure measurements and angiographic findings were recorded on 99 patients. There were no deaths, two patients (2.0%) suffered a perioperative stroke (CVA) and one (1.0%) a transient ischaemic attack (TIA). An additional eight patients "obtunded" while the internal carotid artery was clamped, with complete resolution upon revascularisation in all but one patient who recovered fully within 24 h. Patients with contralateral occlusion or ≥80% stenosis were more likely to develop complications (6/25 vs. 5/74 p < 0.03) and stump pressures were significantly lower in patients suffering an event (34.36 ± 23.15 vs. 55.57 ± 27.58, p < 0.02). By combining contralateral stenosis (≥80%) and stump pressure (≤35 mmHg), a "high risk" group of 42 patients in whom eight of the 11 events occurred, were identified. Contralateral stenosis and low stump pressures can be used in combination to identify high risk patients likely to develop neurological complications during or following CEA. © 1993 Grune & Stratton Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 319
页数:3
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Browse, Ross-Russell, Carotid endarterectomy and the Javid shunt: the early results of 215 consecutive operations for transient ischaemic attacks, Br J Surg, 71, pp. 53-57, (1984)
[2]  
Aki, Blakeley, Lewis, Edwards, Carotid endarterectomy: is a shunt necessary?, Am J Surg, 130, pp. 764-765, (1975)
[3]  
Forssell, Takolander, Bergqvist, Johansson, Persson, Local versus general anaesthesia in carotid surgery. A prospective randomised study, Eur J Vase Surg, 3, pp. 503-509, (1989)
[4]  
Javid, Hunter, Goldin, Surgical treatment of cerebral ischaemia, Surg Clin North Am, 54, pp. 239-255, (1974)
[5]  
Kwan, Peterson, Connolly, Stump Pressure, Archives of Surgery, 115, pp. 1083-1085, (1980)
[6]  
Evans, Hayes, Waltke, Vermilion, Optimal cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: neurologic response under local anaesthesia, J Vasc Surg, 2, pp. 775-777, (1985)
[7]  
Morawetz, Zeiger, McDowell, Et al., Correlation of cerebral blood flow and EEG during carotid occlusion for endarterectomy (without shunting) and neurologic outcome, Surgery, 96, pp. 184-189, (1984)
[8]  
Hafner, Evans, Carotid endarterectomy with local anesthesia: results and advantages, J Vase Surg, 7, pp. 232-239, (1988)
[9]  
Baker, Dorner, Barnes, Carotid endarterectomy: is an indwelling shunt necessary?, Surgery, 82, pp. 321-326, (1977)
[10]  
Moore, Yee, Hall, Collateral cerebral blood pressure. An index of tolerance to temporary carotid occlusion, Arch Surg, 106, pp. 520-523, (1973)