Corporate governance mechanisms and audit delay in a joint audit regulation

被引:26
作者
Alfraih, Mishari M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Publ Author Appl Educ & Training, Coll Business Studies, Dept Accounting, Accounting, Kuwait, Kuwait
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Accounting, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Auditing; Annual report; Accounting regulation; Capital markets;
D O I
10.1108/JFRC-09-2015-0054
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to examine the influence of corporate governance mechanisms on audit delay in companies listed on the Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE) in 2013. Kuwait has the unusual audit regulation that listed companies must be jointly audited by two independent auditors who both sign the report. Design/methodology/approach - Audit delay is measured as the number of days that elapse between the end of the company's financial year and the date of the audit report. A multivariate regression model analyzes the association between audit delay and six corporate governance mechanisms, namely, joint auditor combination, board size, board independence, role duality, institutional ownership and government ownership. Findings - There is a wide range in audit delay among KSE companies, ranging from 7 to 159 days. After controlling for various company characteristics, there is a significant difference in the timeliness of audit reports depending on the combination of auditors: audit delay is significantly reduced when the audit is performed by Big-4 companies. Moreover, companies with larger boards, a greater number of independent directors and separate CEO-chairman roles are more likely to produce timely financial statements. Higher government ownership levels were associated with greater audit delay, while no significant association was found for institutional ownership. These results are robust to a variety of sensitivity checks. Practical implications - The findings highlight the effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms in shaping the timeliness of audit reports; thus, these mechanisms should be taken into account in any regulatory action to reduce audit delay. In addition, the findings of this study provide empirical evidence that can be used by regulators and enforcement bodies in their continued campaigns promoting the role and importance of corporate governance mechanisms in improving the quality and timeliness of financial reporting. Originality/value - The study extends the audit delay literature by investigating the issue in a joint audit setting. The empirical evidence shows a wide range of audit delay in KSE-listed companies, which raises questions about the costs and benefits of the joint audit regulation for the length of this period.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 316
页数:25
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Auditor Industry Specialism and Reporting Timeliness [J].
Abidin, Shamharir ;
Ahmad-Zaluki, Nurwati A. .
INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INTERDISCIPLINARY BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 2012 (ICIBSOS 2012), 2012, 65 :873-878
[2]   Determinants of audit report lag Does implementing corporate governance have any impact? Empirical evidence from Egypt [J].
Afify, H. A. E. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2009, 10 (01) :56-+
[3]   Corporate governance in Kuwait: An analysis in terms of grounded theory [J].
Al-Saidi M. ;
Al-Shammari B. .
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2014, 11 (2) :128-160
[4]   Does the existence of voluntary audit committees really affect IFRS-required disclosure the Kuwaiti evidence [J].
Alanezi F.S. ;
Albuloushi S.S. .
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2011, 8 (2) :148-173
[5]   The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on the Performance of UAE Firms: An Empirical Analysis [J].
Aljifri, Khaled ;
Moustafa, Mohamed .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2007, 23 (02) :71-93
[6]   Audit reports timeliness: Empirical evidence from Jordan [J].
Alkhatib, Khalid ;
Marji, Qais .
WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (BEM-2012), 2012, 62 :1342-1349
[7]   AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS OF AUDIT DELAY [J].
ASHTON, RH ;
WILLINGHAM, JJ ;
ELLIOTT, RK .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1987, 25 (02) :275-292
[8]  
Ashton RH., 1989, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V5, P657
[9]  
Ayemere I. L., 2015, INT J BUSINESS SOCIA, V5, P1
[10]  
BAMBER EM, 1993, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V12, P1