The Necessity for a Business and Human Rights Treaty

被引:50
作者
Bilchitz, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] South African Inst Adv Constitut Publ Human Right, Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Int Assoc Constitut Law, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
fundamental rights; treaty; Guiding Principles; access to remedies; international law;
D O I
10.1017/bhj.2016.13
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In June 2014, the Human Rights Council passed a resolution establishing an inter-governmental working group to discuss a legally binding instrument relating to transnational corporations and other business enterprises. In this article, I outline four arguments for why such an instrument is desirable. Identifying the purpose of such a treaty is crucial in outlining a vision of what it should seek to achieve and in determining its content. The arguments indicate that a treaty is necessary to provide legal solutions to cure serious lacunae and ambiguities in the current framework of international law which have a serious negative impact upon the rights of individuals affected by corporate activities. The emphasis throughout is upon why a binding legal instrument is important, as opposed to softer forms of regulation such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The four arguments in turn provide the resources to respond to objections raised against the treaty and to reject an alternative, more restrictive proposal for a treaty that only addresses 'gross' human rights violations.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 227
页数:25
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Abbott F. A, 2006, INT TRADE HUMAN RIGH
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, CORPORATIONS TRANSNA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, AFRICAN HUMAN RIGHTS, V60
  • [4] Benedetti F, 1999, GLOBAL GOV, V5, P1
  • [5] Bhandari Surendra, 2012, TRADE LAW DEV, V4, P356
  • [6] Bilchitz D, 2016, TYDSKR SUID-AFR REG, P45
  • [7] BILCHITZ D., 2010, THEORIA-SPAIN, P11
  • [8] BILCHITZ D, 2013, S AFRICAN LAW J, P794
  • [9] Bilchitz David, 2016, INDIANA J GLOBAL STU
  • [10] Bilchitz David, 2014, REASONING RIGHTS COM, P41