The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and mental health law: A critical review

被引:3
作者
Ramos Pozon, Sergio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Fac Philol, C Gran Via Corts Catalanes 585, E-08007 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD); Mental illness; Disability; Human rights; Development; Critic;
D O I
10.1016/j.alter.2016.07.001
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is an international treatise about human rights that was adopted by the United Nations in 2006. Although it is a welcome articulation of the rights of persons with disabilities, a detailed review of the text detects some insufficiencies and challenges, especially when analyzed in light of people with mental illness. This paper aims at revising critically the text of the Convention in order to detect such troubles. It would allow us a better understanding of the text if we really want to protect and defend rights of persons with disabilities. Thus, in this paper the author will revise concepts used by the Committee and the Convention such as "disability", "legal capacity" and "mental capacity", "discrimination". Moreover, according to the concept of "safeguards", this paper will introduce psychiatric advance directives and shared decision-making as two tools in order to defend persons with mental illness. Both preserve the background of the Convention, such as respect for the dignity and autonomy, provide care without discrimination, and encourage rehabilitation, which implies a better quality of life. (C) 2016 Association ALTER. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 309
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CRPD COMM GEN COMM N
[2]   Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment [J].
Appelbaum, Paul S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (18) :1834-1840
[3]   Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinions on psychiatric advance directives [J].
Backlar, P ;
McFarland, BH ;
Swanson, JW ;
Mahler, J .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (06) :427-441
[4]  
Bitter Istvan, 2015, Psychiatr Hung, V30, P18
[5]   A realistic approach to assessing mental health laws' compliance with the UNCRPD [J].
Dawson, John .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 40 :70-79
[6]   Effectively implementing psychiatric advance directives to promote self-determination of treatment among people with mental illness [J].
Elbogen, Eric B. ;
Swanson, Jeffrey W. ;
Swartz, Marvin S. ;
Van Dorn, Richard ;
Ferron, Joelle ;
Wagner, H. Ryan ;
Wilder, Christine .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2007, 13 (04) :273-288
[7]   Reversing hard won victories in the name of human rights: a critique of the General Comment on Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [J].
Freeman, Melvyn Colin ;
Kolappa, Kavitha ;
de Almeida, Jose Miguel Caldas ;
Kleinman, Arthur ;
Makhashvili, Nino ;
Phakathi, Sifiso ;
Saraceno, Benedetto ;
Thornicroft, Graham .
LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 2 (09) :844-850
[8]   Shared decision making and long-term outcome in schizophrenia treatment [J].
Hamann, Johannes ;
Cohen, Rudolf ;
Leucht, Stefan ;
Busch, Raymonde ;
Kissling, Werner .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 68 (07) :992-997
[9]   Why Do Some Patients With Schizophrenia Want to Be Engaged in Medical Decision Making and Others Do Not? [J].
Hamann, Johannes ;
Mendel, Rosmarie ;
Reiter, Sarah ;
Cohen, Rudolf ;
Buehner, Markus ;
Schebitz, Matthias ;
Diplich, Stefan ;
Kissling, Werner ;
Berthele, Achim .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 72 (12) :1636-1643
[10]  
Hill S.A., 2006, J MENTAL HLTH, V15, P75, DOI DOI 10.1080/09638230500512250