ANESTHETIC EFFECTS ON MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN DOGS

被引：25

作者：

GLASSMAN, SD

SHIELDS, CB

LINDEN, RD

ZHANG, YP

NIXON, AR

JOHNSON, JR

机构：

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, University of Louisville, School of Medicine and Kenton D. Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY

[2] Department of Surgery (Neurosurgery), University of Louisville, School of Medicine and Kenton D. Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY

来源：

SPINE | 1993年 / 18卷 / 08期

关键词：

MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIALS; ANESTHESIA; NEUROPHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING;

D O I：

10.1097/00007632-199306150-00020

中图分类号：

R74 [神经病学与精神病学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The effects of the various anesthetic agents on the production of transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (tcMMEP) were studied in a canine model. Pre-anesthetic baseline tcMMEPs demonstrated consistency in onset latency measurements and variability in measurement of peak-to-peak amplitudes. Changes in tcMMEPs were evaluated following the individual administrations of sodium pentothal, etomidate, halothane, fentanyl, and ketamine. For induction of anesthesia, etomidate was compatible with tcMMEP production, whereas sodium pentothal resulted in loss of hindlimb potentials for a period of 45 minutes. For maintenance of anesthesia, halothane was incompatible with the measurement of tcMMEPs. Fentanyl administration was consistent with the recording of reliable tcMMEPs, with consistent onset latencies but widely variable peak-to-peak amplitudes. Ketamine was compatible with stable and reproducible tcMMEP production. The results of this study suggest that anesthetic agents have a predictable and consistent effect on tcMMEP responses.

引用

页码：1083 / 1089

页数：7

共 14 条

[1]

Barker A.T., Freeston I.L., Jalinous R., Jerratt JA. Magnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: An introduction and the results of an initial clinical evaluation, Neurosurg, 1, pp. 100-109, (1987)

[2]

Daube J.R., Intraoperative monitoring by evoked potentials for spinal cord surgery, The Pros. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 73, pp. 374-377, (1989)

[3]

Day B.L., Dressier D., Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: Surface EMG and single motor unit responses, J Physiol, 412, pp. 449-473, (1989)

[4]

Edmonds H.L., Paloheimo M., Backman M.H., Johnson J.R., Holt R.T., Shields C.B., Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potentials (TcMMEP) for functional monitoring o f motor pathways during scoliosis surgery, Spine, 14, pp. 683-686, (1989)

[5]

Ghaly R.F., Stone J.L., Levy W.J., Reccaforte P., Brunner E.B., The effect of etomidate on motor evoked potentials induced by tran sc r an ia l magnetic stimulation in the monkey, Neurosurgery, 27, pp. 936-942, (1990)

[6]

Ginsburg H.H., Shetter A.G., Raudzeus P.A., Postoperative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials: Case Report, J Neurosurg, 63, pp. 296-300, (1985)

[7]

Koht A., Anesthesia Influence on Recording: Summary. Neurophysiology and Standards of Spinal Cord Monitoring, pp. 188-197, (1988)

[8]

Lesser R.P., Raudzens P.A., Luders H., Nuwer M.R., Goldie W.D., Morris I., Dinner D.S., Klem G., Hahn J.F., Shetter A.G., Ginsberg H.H., Gurd A.R., Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials, Ann Neurol 1986, 19, pp. 22-25, (1986)

[9]

Mills K.R., Murray M.N., Hess C.W., Magnetic and electrical transcranial brain stimulation: Physiological mechanisms and clinical applications, Neurosurgery, 20, pp. 164-168, (1987)

[10]

Owen J.H., Padberg A.M., O'Meilia R.M., Bridwell K.H., Linn E.J., A Comparison of Myogenic and Neurogenic Motor Evoked Potentials Elicited from Humans during Surgery for Spinal Deformity, (1991)

← 1 2 →